Argument Principle - Proof of The Argument Principle

Proof of The Argument Principle

Let zN be a zero of f. We can write f(z) = (zzN)kg(z) where k is the multiplicity of the zero, and thus g(zN) ≠ 0. We get

and

Since g(zN) ≠ 0, it follows that g' (z)/g(z) has no singularities at zN, and thus is analytic at zN, which implies that the residue of f′(z)/f(z) at zN is k.

Let zP be a pole of f. We can write f(z) = (zzP)−mh(z) where m is the order of the pole, and thus h(zP) ≠ 0. Then,

and

similarly as above. It follows that h′(z)/h(z) has no singularities at zP since h(zP) ≠ 0 and thus it is analytic at zP. We find that the residue of f′(z)/f(z) at zP is −m.

Putting these together, each zero zN of multiplicity k of f creates a simple pole for f′(z)/f(z) with the residue being k, and each pole zP of order m of f creates a simple pole for f′(z)/f(z) with the residue being −m. (Here, by a simple pole we mean a pole of order one.) In addition, it can be shown that f′(z)/f(z) has no other poles, and so no other residues.

By the residue theorem we have that the integral about C is the product of 2πi and the sum of the residues. Together, the sum of the k 's for each zero zN is the number of zeros counting multiplicities of the zeros, and likewise for the poles, and so we have our result.

Read more about this topic:  Argument Principle

Famous quotes containing the words proof of the, proof of, proof, argument and/or principle:

    The fact that several men were able to become infatuated with that latrine is truly the proof of the decline of the men of this century.
    Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)

    The insatiable thirst for everything which lies beyond, and which life reveals, is the most living proof of our immortality.
    Charles Baudelaire (1821–1867)

    a meek humble Man of modest sense,
    Who preaching peace does practice continence;
    Whose pious life’s a proof he does believe,
    Mysterious truths, which no Man can conceive.
    John Wilmot, 2d Earl Of Rochester (1647–1680)

    Because a person is born the subject of a given state, you deny the sovereignty of the people? How about the child of Cuban slaves who is born a slave, is that an argument for slavery? The one is a fact as well as the other. Why then, if you use legal arguments in the one case, you don’t in the other?
    Franz Grillparzer (1791–1872)

    Thanks to all. For the great republic—for the principle it lives by, and keeps alive—for man’s vast future,—thanks to all.
    Abraham Lincoln (1809–1865)