In algebra, the absorption law or absorption identity is an identity linking a pair of binary operations.
Two binary operations, say ¤ and *, are said to be connected by the absorption law if:
- a ¤ (a * b) = a * (a ¤ b) = a.
A set equipped with two commutative and associative binary operations ∨ ("join") and ∧ ("meet") which are connected by the absorption law
- a ∨ (a ∧ b) = a ∧ (a ∨ b) = a
is called a lattice. Examples of lattices include Boolean algebras and Heyting algebras.
In classical logic, and in particular in Boolean algebra, the operations OR and AND, which are also denoted by and, also satisfy the lattice axioms, including the absorption law. The same is true for intuitionistic logic.
The commutative and associative laws also hold for addition and multiplication in commutative rings, e.g. in the field of real numbers. The absorption law is the critical property that is missing in this case, since in general a · (a + b) ≠ a and a + (a · b) ≠ a.
The absorption law also fails to hold for relevance logics, linear logics, and substructural logics. In the last case, there is no one-to-one correspondence between the free variables of the defining pair of identities.
Famous quotes containing the words absorption and/or law:
“The radio ... goes on early in the morning and is listened to at all hours of the day, until nine, ten and often eleven o’clock in the evening. This is certainly a sign that the grown-ups have infinite patience, but it also means that the power of absorption of their brains is pretty limited, with exceptions, of course—I don’t want to hurt anyone’s feelings. One or two news bulletins would be ample per day! But the old geese, well—I’ve said my piece!”
—Anne Frank (1929–1945)
“I was not born to be forced. I will breathe after my own fashion. Let us see who is the strongest. What force has a multitude? They can only force me who obey a higher law than I.... I do not hear of men being forced to live this way or that by masses of men. What sort of life were that to live?”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)