2007 Rally de Portugal - Results

Results

Pos. Driver Co-driver Car Time Difference Points
WRC
1. Sébastien Loeb Daniel Elena Citroën C4 WRC 3:53:33.1 0.0 10
2. Petter Solberg Phil Mills Subaru Impreza WRC 3:56:47.0 3:13.9 8
3. Daniel Sordo Marc Marti Citroën C4 WRC 3:58:38.4 5:05.3 6
4. Marcus Grönholm Timo Rautiainen Ford Focus RS WRC 06 3:59:10.2 5:37.1 5
5. Mikko Hirvonen Jarmo Lehtinen Ford Focus RS WRC 06 4:00:41.2 7:08.1 4
6. Daniel Carlsson Denis Giraudet Citroën Xsara WRC 4:01:46.3 8:13.2 3
7. Gian-Luigi Galli Giovanni Bernacchni Citroën Xsara WRC 4:03:12.7 9:39.6 2
8. Jari-Matti Latvala Miikka Anttila Ford Focus RS WRC 06 4:04:18.0 10:44.9 1
JRC
1. (14.) Per-Gunner Andersson Jonas Andersson Suzuki Swift S1600 4:22:43.4 0.0 10
2. (15.) Urmo Aava Kuldar Sikk Suzuki Swift S1600 4:22:47.1 3.7 8
3. (18.) Jozef Béreš jun. Petr Starý Renault Clio S1600 4:30:32.3 7:48.9 6
4. (21.) Jaan Mölder jr. Katrin Becker Suzuki Swift S1600 4:34.39.9 11:56.5 5
5. (22.) Andrea Cortinovis Flavio Zanella Renault Clio S1600 4:37.37.2 14:53.8 4
6. (26.) Manuel Rueda Borja Rozada Renault Clio R3 4:43:38.1 20:54.7 3
7. (30.) Shaun Gallagher Clive Jenkins Citroën C2 S1600 4:49:23.3 26:39.9 2
8. (32.) Vilius Rožukas Audrius Šošas Suzuki Swift S1600 4:55:58.3 33:14.9 1
— Drivers using SupeRally

Read more about this topic:  2007 Rally De Portugal

Famous quotes containing the word results:

    I have no doubt that it was a principle they fought for, as much as our ancestors, and not to avoid a three-penny tax on their tea; and the results of this battle will be as important and memorable to those whom it concerns as those of the battle of Bunker Hill, at least.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    It would be easy ... to regard the whole of world 3 as timeless, as Plato suggested of his world of Forms or Ideas.... I propose a different view—one which, I have found, is surprisingly fruitful. I regard world 3 as being essentially the product of the human mind.... More precisely, I regard the world 3 of problems, theories, and critical arguments as one of the results of the evolution of human language, and as acting back on this evolution.
    Karl Popper (1902–1994)

    For every life and every act
    Consequence of good and evil can be shown
    And as in time results of many deeds are blended
    So good and evil in the end become confounded.
    —T.S. (Thomas Stearns)