Definition
Let be a compact smooth manifold of dimension . The normalized Einstein–Hilbert functional assigns to each Riemannian metric on a real number as follows:
where is the scalar curvature of and is the volume form associated to the metric . Note that the exponent in the denominator is chosen so that the functional is scale-invariant. We may think of as measuring the average scalar curvature of over . It was conjectured by Yamabe that every conformal class of metrics contains a metric of constant scalar curvature (the so-called Yamabe problem); it was proven by Yamabe, Trudinger, Aubin, and Schoen that a minimum value of is attained in each conformal class of metrics, and in particular this minimum is achieved by a metric of constant scalar curvature. We may thus define
where the infimum is taken over the smooth functions on . The number is sometimes called the conformal Yamabe energy of (and is constant on conformal classes).
A comparison argument due to Aubin shows that for any metric, is bounded above by, where is the standard metric on the -sphere . The number is equal to and is often denoted . It follows that if we define
where the supremum is taken over all metrics on, then (and is in particular finite). The real number is called the Yamabe invariant of .
Read more about this topic: Yamabe Invariant
Famous quotes containing the word definition:
“Scientific method is the way to truth, but it affords, even in
principle, no unique definition of truth. Any so-called pragmatic
definition of truth is doomed to failure equally.”
—Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)
“It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.”
—François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)
“Beauty, like all other qualities presented to human experience, is relative; and the definition of it becomes unmeaning and useless in proportion to its abstractness. To define beauty not in the most abstract, but in the most concrete terms possible, not to find a universal formula for it, but the formula which expresses most adequately this or that special manifestation of it, is the aim of the true student of aesthetics.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)