Functional Classification of Writing Systems
For lists of writing systems by type, see List of writing systems.Several approaches have been taken to classify writing systems, the most common and basic one is a broad division into three categories: logographic, syllabic, and alphabetic (or segmental); however, all three may be found in any given writing system in varying proportions, often making it difficult to categorise a system uniquely. The term complex system is sometimes used to describe those where the admixture makes classification problematic. Modern linguists regard such approaches, including Diringer's
- pictographic script
- ideographic script
- analytic transitional script
- phonetic script
- alphabetic script
as too simplistic, often considering the categories to be incomparable. Hill split writing into three major categories of linguistic analysis, one of which covers discourses and is not usually considered writing proper:
- discourse system
- iconic discourse system, e.g. Amerindian
- conventional discourse system, e.g. Quipu
- morphemic writing system, e.g. Egyptian, Sumerian, Maya, Chinese
- phonemic writing system
- partial phonemic writing system, e.g. Egyptian, Hebrew, Arabic
- poly-phonemic writing system, e.g. Linear B, Kana, Cherokee
- mono-phonemic writing system
- phonemic writing system, e.g. Ancient Greek, Old English
- morpho-phonemic writing system, e.g. German, Modern English
DeFrancis, criticizing Sampson's introduction of semasiographic writing and featural alphabets stresses the phonographic quality of writing proper
- pictures
- nonwriting
- writing
- rebus
- syllabic systems
- pure syllabic, e.g. Linear B, Yi, Kana, Cherokee
- morpho-syllabic, e.g. Sumerian, Chinese, Mayan
- consonantal
- morpho-consonantal, e.g. Egyptian
- pure consonantal, e.g. Phoenician
- alphabetic
- pure phonemic, e.g. Greek
- morpho-phonemic, e.g. English
- syllabic systems
- rebus
Faber categorizes phonographic writing by two levels, linearity and coding:
- logographic, e.g. Chinese, Ancient Egyptian
- phonographic
- syllabically linear
- syllabically coded, e.g. Kana, Akkadian
- segmentally coded, e.g. Hebrew, Syriac, Arabic, Ethiopian, Amharic, Devanagari
- segmentally linear
- complete (alphabet), e.g. Greco-Latin, Cyrillic
- defective, e.g. Ugaritic, Phoenician, Aramaic, Old South Arabian, Old Hebrew
- syllabically linear
Type | Each symbol represents | Example |
---|---|---|
Logographic | morpheme | Chinese characters |
Syllabic | syllable or mora | Japanese kana |
Alphabetic | phoneme (consonant or vowel) | Latin alphabet |
Abugida | phoneme (consonant+vowel) | Indian Devanāgarī |
Abjad | phoneme (consonant) | Arabic alphabet |
Featural | phonetic feature | Korean hangul |
Read more about this topic: Writing System
Famous quotes containing the words functional, writing and/or systems:
“Indigenous to Minnesota, and almost completely ignored by its people, are the stark, unornamented, functional clusters of concreteMinnesotas grain elevators. These may be said to express unconsciously all the principles of modernism, being built for use only, with little regard for the tenets of esthetic design.”
—Federal Writers Project Of The Wor, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“I am writing to resist the view that Europe and civilization are going to Hell. If I am being crucified for an ideaMthat is, the coherent idea around which my muddles accumulatedit is probably the idea that European culture ought to survive, that the best qualities of it ought to survive along with whatever cultures, in whatever universality. Against the propaganda of terror and the propaganda of luxury, have you a nice simple answer?”
—Ezra Pound (18851972)
“Our little systems have their day;
They have their day and cease to be:
They are but broken lights of thee,
And thou, O Lord, art more than they.”
—Alfred Tennyson (18091892)