Political Position
The WPK is generally seen as similar to Communist Parties in the industrialized world which occupy a far-left position on the political spectrum. According to conventional wisdom in the West, it is the most hardline and unreformed of the five current ruling Communist/Workers’ parties, and the closest thing to an old-style Stalinist party.
The WPK maintains a leftist image. It sends a delegation to the International Meeting of Communist and Workers' Parties where the WPK receives minor support: Its 2011 resolution “Let us jointly commemorate the Birth Centenary of the Great Leader comrade President Kim Il Sung as a Grand Political Festival of the World’s Humankind” was signed by 30 of the 79 attending parties.
However, professor B. R. Myers argues that there is a stark difference between DPRK’s and WPK’s propaganda to the international audience and domestic propaganda. After analyzing the domestic propaganda, he concluded that the WPK is not a far-left or Communist party, but rather a far-right party. Myers holds that the party has a platform of “race-based, paranoid nationalism that has nothing to do with Marxism-Leninism,” making it more comparable to 1930’s Japan than other Eastern-Bloc communist parties. After the release of Myers’ 2009 book The Cleanest Race, his views gained acceptance. Russian historian Andrei Lankov favorably reviewed it as taking a “fresh approach” on North Korea. Christopher Hitchens called the book and the analysis “electrifying” and “finely argued and brilliantly written”.
Read more about this topic: Workers' Party Of Korea
Famous quotes containing the words political and/or position:
“Modern equalitarian societies ... whether democratic or authoritarian in their political forms, always base themselves on the claim that they are making life happier.... Happiness thus becomes the chief political issue—in a sense, the only political issue—and for that reason it can never be treated as an issue at all.”
—Robert Warshow (1917–1955)
“You will belong to that minority which, according to current Washington doctrine, must be protected in its affluence lest its energy and initiative be impaired. Your position will be in contrast to that of the poor, to whom money, especially if it is from public sources, is held to be deeply damaging.”
—John Kenneth Galbraith (b. 1908)