The University of Makati (UMak), formerly the Pamantasan ng Makati, is a city university in Makati City, Philippines. It is one of the best and known locally-funded university in the Philippines in terms of board examination (CPA, Teacher, Nurse etc.) passing percentage, employability of graduates, quality of education, and others.
UMak has earned the coveted ISO (International Organization for Standardization) 9001:2008 Certification from SGS Philippines, becoming the first local university in the country to be ISO-certified. UMak has successfully passed the Stage 2 Audit of the (ISO) 9001-2008 conducted on December 12–13, 2011
The University of Makati has seven colleges and one center: College of Business Administration, College of Computer Science, College of Arts, Sciences and Education, College of Technology Management, College of Governance and Public Policy, College of Allied Health Studies, College of Human Kenetics, and Center for Performing and Digital Arts.
Read more about University Of Makati: Brief History, Buildings and Facilities, University & Student Organizations/clubs/groups, Colleges and Centers, Philippines' 1st ISO Certified Local University, UMak's Performance in Licensure Board Exams, UMak in Guinness World Records, Sports in UMak, Notable Alumni, See Also
Famous quotes containing the words university of and/or university:
“The information links are like nerves that pervade and help to animate the human organism. The sensors and monitors are analogous to the human senses that put us in touch with the world. Data bases correspond to memory; the information processors perform the function of human reasoning and comprehension. Once the postmodern infrastructure is reasonably integrated, it will greatly exceed human intelligence in reach, acuity, capacity, and precision.”
—Albert Borgman, U.S. educator, author. Crossing the Postmodern Divide, ch. 4, University of Chicago Press (1992)
“It is in the nature of allegory, as opposed to symbolism, to beg the question of absolute reality. The allegorist avails himself of a formal correspondence between “ideas” and “things,” both of which he assumes as given; he need not inquire whether either sphere is “real” or whether, in the final analysis, reality consists in their interaction.”
—Charles, Jr. Feidelson, U.S. educator, critic. Symbolism and American Literature, ch. 1, University of Chicago Press (1953)