Thomas R. Marshall - Electoral History

Electoral History

State prosecutor for northeastern Indiana, 1880
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Republican Elijah Jackson 5,594 52.7%
Democratic Thomas R. Marshall 5,023 47.3%
Indiana gubernatorial election, 1908
Party Candidate Votes Percentage
Democratic Thomas R. Marshall 348,439 48.1%
Republican James E. Watson 338,262 48%
Prohibition Samuel W. Haynes 15,926 2.3%
Populist F.J.S. Robinson 986 0.1%

United States presidential election, 1912

Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote Electoral
vote
Running mate
Count Pct Vice-presidential candidate Home state Elect. vote
Thomas Woodrow Wilson Democratic New Jersey 6,296,284 41.8% 435 Thomas Riley Marshall Indiana 435
Theodore Roosevelt Progressive New York 4,122,721 27.4% 88 Hiram Warren Johnson California 88
William Howard Taft Republican Ohio 3,486,242 23.2% 8 Nicholas Murray Butler New York 8
Eugene Victor Debs Socialist Indiana 901,551 6.0% 0 Emil Seidel Wisconsin 0
Eugene Wilder Chafin Prohibition Illinois 208,156 1.4% 0 Aaron Sherman Watkins Ohio 0
Arthur Elmer Reimer Socialist Labor Massachusetts 29,324 0.2% 0 August Gilhaus New York 0
Other 4,556 0.0% Other
Total 15,048,834 100% 531 531
Needed to win 266 266

United States presidential election, 1916

Presidential candidate Party Home state Popular vote Electoral
vote
Running mate
Count Pct Vice-presidential candidate Home state Elect. vote
Woodrow Wilson Democratic New Jersey 9,126,868 49.2% 277 Thomas Riley Marshall Indiana 277
Charles Evans Hughes Republican New York 8,548,728 46.1% 254 Charles Warren Fairbanks Indiana 254
Allan Louis Benson Socialist New York 590,524 3.2% 0 George Ross Kirkpatrick New Jersey 0
James Franklin Hanly Prohibition Indiana 221,302 1.2% 0 Ira Landrith Tennessee 0
Other 49,163 0.3% Other
Total 18,536,585 100% 531 531
Needed to win 266 266

Read more about this topic:  Thomas R. Marshall

Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or history:

    Power is action; the electoral principle is discussion. No political action is possible when discussion is permanently established.
    Honoré De Balzac (1799–1850)

    Certainly there is not the fight recorded in Concord history, at least, if in the history of America, that will bear a moment’s comparison with this, whether for the numbers engaged in it, or for the patriotism and heroism displayed.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)