Since the early 1990s, American and International forensic science laboratories and practitioners have collaborated in Scientific Working Groups (SWGs) to improve discipline practices and build consensus standards. As of January 2012, active SWGs include the following:
- FISWG - Facial Identification Scientific Working Group
- SWGANTH - Forensic Anthropology
- SWGCBRN - Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear
- SWGDAM - DNA Analysis
- SWGDE - Digital Evidence
- SWGDMI - Medicolegal Death Investigation
- SWGDOC - Questioned Documents
- SWGDOG - Dogs and Orthogonal Detection
- SWGDRUG - Analysis of Seized Drugs
- SWGDVI - Disaster Victim Identification
- SWGFAST - Latent Fingerprints
- SWGFEX - Fire and Explosives Scenes
- SWGGSR - Gunshot Residue
- SWGGUN - Firearms and Toolmarks
- SWGIBRA - Illicit Business Records
- SWGIT - Imaging Technologies
- SWGMAT - Materials Analysis
- SWGSTAIN - Bloodstain Pattern Analysis
- SWGTOX - Toxicology
- SWGTREAD - Footwear and Tiretracks
- SWGWILD - Wildlife Forensics
- SWGGEO
Each SWG includes scientists working within the focus field. Although a couple the above-listed SWGs have only American members, most also have international members. Federal, state or local government forensic laboratory scientists are the most common SWG members, but many SWGs also include other experts such as private laboratory scientists, academia, independent consultants, attorneys and judges.
Most SWGs have public websites with discipline-specific resources including approved and draft for comment standards, best practices guidelines and related documents.
Famous quotes containing the words scientific, working and/or group:
“In the domain of Political Economy, free scientific inquiry meets not merely the same enemies as in all other domains. The peculiar nature of the material it deals with, summons as foes into the field of battle the most violent, mean and malignant passions of the human breast, the Furies of private interest.”
—Karl Marx (1818–1883)
“Asking a working writer what he thinks about critics is like asking a lamp-post what it feels about dogs.”
—Christopher Hampton (b. 1946)
“Jury—A group of twelve men who, having lied to the judge about their hearing, health, and business engagements, have failed to fool him.”
—H.L. (Henry Lewis)