Scarborough Southwest - Election Results

Election Results

Canadian federal election, 2011
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
New Democratic Dan Harris 14,119 35.04 +16.29
Conservative Gavan Paranchothy 12,830 31.85 +2.34
Liberal Michelle Simson 11,699 29.05 -12.77
Green Stefan Dixon 1,635 4.06 -5.43
Total valid votes/Expense limit 40,283 100.00 –
Total rejected ballots 218 0.54 +0.01 –
Turnout 40,501 59.45 +4.71 –
Eligible voters 68,122 – – –
Canadian federal election, 2008
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Liberal Michelle Simson 15,486 41.82 -6.06 $61,923
Conservative Greg Crompton 10,928 29.51 +5.37 $52,973
New Democratic Alamgir Hussain 6,943 18.75 -4.15 $22,985
Green Stefan Dixon 3,514 9.49 +5.08 $588
Independent M. H. Fatique Chowdhury Kabir 151 0.40 –
Total valid votes/Expense limit 37,022 100.00 – $80,366
Total rejected ballots 195 0.52 +0.07 –
Turnout 37,217 54.74 -7.63 –
Eligible voters 67,988 – – –
Liberal hold Swing -5.7 – –
Canadian federal election, 2006: Scarborough Southwest
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Liberal Tom Wappel 19,930 47.83 -1.63 $31,803
Conservative Vincent Veerasuntharam 10,017 24.04 +0.26 $68,687
New Democratic Party Dan Harris 9,626 23.10 +0.79 $18,101
Green Valerie Philip 1,827 4.38 +0.38
Independent Trevor Sutton 147 0.35
Communist Elizabeth Rowley 120 0.29 -0.15 $280
Total valid votes 41,667 100.00
Total rejected ballots 189 0.45 -0.11
Turnout 41,856 62.37 +5.21
Electors on the lists 67,109
Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.
Canadian federal election, 2004: Scarborough Southwest
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Liberal Tom Wappel 18,776 49.46 -10.36 $47,511
Conservative Heather Jewell 9,028 23.78 -4.59 $63,040
New Democratic Party Dan Harris 8,471 22.31 +12.05 $21,397
Green Peter Van Dalen 1,520 4.00 not listed
Communist Elizabeth Rowley 168 0.44 $300
Total valid votes 37,963 100.00
Total rejected ballots 215 0.56 -0.10
Turnout 38,178 57.16 +3.73
Electors on the lists 66,797
Percentage change figures are factored for redistribution. Conservative Party percentages are contrasted with the combined Canadian Alliance and Progressive Conservative percentages from 2000.
Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.
Canadian federal election, 2000: Scarborough Southwest
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Liberal Tom Wappel 21,466 60.01 +6.61 $47,146
Progressive Conservative Ellery Hollingsworth 5,251 14.68 +1.01 $14,019
Canadian Alliance Nabil El-Khazen 4,912 13.73 -6.72 $30,429
New Democratic Party Dan Harris 3,638 10.17 -1.05 $10,666
Canadian Action Walter Aolari 336 0.94 $4,886
Communist Dora Stewart 165 0.46 $202
Total valid votes 35,768 100.00
Total rejected ballots 237 0.66 -0.04
Turnout 36,005 53.43 -9.52
Electors on the lists 67,382
Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.
Canadian federal election, 1997: Scarborough Southwest
Party Candidate Votes % ±pp Expenditures
Liberal Tom Wappel 20,675 53.40 -1.34 $35,520
Reform Tom Ambas 7,918 20.45 -0.62 $41,884
Progressive Conservative Brian McCutcheon 5,294 13.67 -0.70 $16,872
New Democratic Party Dave Gracey 4,345 11.22 +4.28 $7,984
Green David James Cooper 482 1.25 $0.00
Total valid votes 38,714 100.00
Total rejected ballots 273 0.70
Turnout 38,987 62.95
Electors on the lists 61,932
Percentage change figures are factored for redistribution.
Sources: Official Results, Elections Canada and Financial Returns, Elections Canada.

All electoral information is taken from Elections Canada. Italicized expenditures from elections after 1997 refer to candidate submissions, and are presented when the final reviewed totals are not available. Expenditures from 1997 refer to submitted totals. The +/- figures from 1997 and 2004 are adjusted for redistribution.

Read more about this topic:  Scarborough Southwest

Famous quotes containing the words election and/or results:

    “The election makes me think of a story of a man who was dying. He had only two minutes to live, so he sent for a clergyman and asked him, “Where is the best place to go to?” He was undecided about it. So the minister told him that each place had its advantages—heaven for climate, and hell for society.”
    —Mark Twain [Samuel Langhorne Clemens] (1835–1910)

    “If family communication is good, parents can pick up the signs of stress in children and talk about it before it results in some crisis. If family communication is bad, not only will parents be insensitive to potential crises, but the poor communication will contribute to problems in the family.”
    —Donald C. Medeiros (20th century)