Taxonomy and Distribution
There have been over 40 described subspecies of the red squirrel, but the taxonomic status of some of these is uncertain. A study published in 1971 recognises 16 subspecies and has served as a basis for subsequent taxonomic work. At present, there are 23 recognized subspecies.
- S. v. alpinus. Desmarest, 1822. (Synonyms: S. v. baeticus, hoffmanni, infuscatus, italicus, meridionalis, numantius, segurae or silanus.)
- S. v. altaicus. Serebrennikov, 1928.
- S. v. anadyrensis. Ognev, 1929.
- S. v. arcticus. Trouessart, 1906. (Synonym: S. v. jacutensis.)
- S. v. balcanicus. Heinrich, 1936. (Synonyms: S. v. istrandjae or rhodopensis.)
- S. v. chiliensis. Sowerby, 1921.
- S. v. cinerea. Hermann, 1804.
- S. v. dulkeiti. Ognev, 1929.
- S. v. exalbidus. Pallas, 1778. (Synonyms: S. v. argenteus or kalbinensis.)
- S. v. fedjushini. Ognev, 1935.
- S. v. formosovi. Ognev, 1935.
- S. v. fuscoater. Altum, 1876. (Synonyms: S. v. brunnea, gotthardi, graeca, nigrescens, russus or rutilans.)
- S. v. fusconigricans. Dvigubsky, 1804
- S. v. leucourus. Kerr, 1792.
- S. v. lilaeus. Miller, 1907. (Synonyms: S. v. ameliae or croaticus.)
- S. v. mantchuricus. Thomas, 1909. (Synonyms: S. v. coreae or coreanus.)
- S. v. martensi. Matschie, 1901. (Synonym: S. v. jenissejensis.)
- S. v. ognevi. Migulin, 1928. (Synonyms: S. v. bashkiricus, golzmajeri or uralensis.)
- S. v. orientis. Thomas, 1906.
- S. v. rupestris. Thomas, 1907
- S. v. ukrainicus. Migulin, 1928. (Synonym: S. v. kessleri.)
- S. v. varius. Gmelin, 1789.
- S. v. vulgaris. Linnaeus, 1758. (Synonyms: S. v. albonotatus, albus, carpathicus, europaeus, niger, rufus or typicus.)
S. vulgaris is classed as a "prohibited new organism" under New Zealand's Hazardous Substances and New Organisms Act 1996 preventing it from being imported into the country.
Read more about this topic: Red Squirrel
Famous quotes containing the word distribution:
“The man who pretends that the distribution of income in this country reflects the distribution of ability or character is an ignoramus. The man who says that it could by any possible political device be made to do so is an unpractical visionary. But the man who says that it ought to do so is something worse than an ignoramous and more disastrous than a visionary: he is, in the profoundest Scriptural sense of the word, a fool.”
—George Bernard Shaw (18561950)