Progressive Conservative Leadership Elections - 1998 Progressive Conservative Leadership Election

1998 Progressive Conservative Leadership Election

Held on October 24 and November 14, 1998. The party's finances were in such a bad state that it could not afford a traditional leadership convention. The 1998 election used a point system that allocated 100 points to each riding, regardless of the number of votes cast in the riding. The candidate who won a majority of points (not necessarily a majority of votres) would win the leadership. All party members were eligible to cast a vote. The 100-point-per-riding system was again used by the Conservative Party of Canada in its 2004 leadership race.

Results by ballot
Candidate 1st ballot (October 24) 2nd ballot (November 14)
Points allotted % Points allotted %
Joe Clark 14,592 48.5% 23,321 77.5%
David Orchard 4,916 16.3% 6,779 22.5%
Hugh Segal 5,689 18.9%
Brian Pallister 3,676 12.2%
Michael Fortier 1,227 4.1%
Total 30,100 100.0% 30,100 100.0%

First Ballot Fortier drops off. Segal and Pallister withdraw. All endorse Clark.

Read more about this topic:  Progressive Conservative Leadership Elections

Famous quotes containing the words progressive, conservative, leadership and/or election:

    There is, I think, no point in the philosophy of progressive education which is sounder than its emphasis upon the importance of the participation of the learner in the formation of the purposes which direct his activities in the learning process, just as there is no defect in traditional education greater than its failure to secure the active cooperation of the pupil in construction of the purposes involved in his studying.
    John Dewey (1859–1952)

    Typical of Iowa towns, whether they have 200 or 20,000 inhabitants, is the church supper, often utilized to raise money for paying off church debts. The older and more conservative members argue that the “House of the Lord” should not be made into a restaurant; nevertheless, all members contribute time and effort, and the products of their gardens and larders.
    —For the State of Iowa, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)

    During the first World War women in the United States had a chance to try their capacities in wider fields of executive leadership in industry. Must we always wait for war to give us opportunity? And must the pendulum always swing back in the busy world of work and workers during times of peace?
    Mary Barnett Gilson (1877–?)

    He hung out of the window a long while looking up and down the street. The world’s second metropolis. In the brick houses and the dingy lamplight and the voices of a group of boys kidding and quarreling on the steps of a house opposite, in the regular firm tread of a policeman, he felt a marching like soldiers, like a sidewheeler going up the Hudson under the Palisades, like an election parade, through long streets towards something tall white full of colonnades and stately. Metropolis.
    John Dos Passos (1896–1970)