Prince of Beira - History

History

The title was presumably created (no records of its earlier existence or grants) by King John IV of Portugal, the new monarch, first of the Braganza dynasty, sometime in 1640's. It was firstly given to his eldest surviving daughter, Infanta Joanna of Portugal, 1st Princess of Beira. It was king John's intention that the male heir apparent would be Prince of Brazil and later also Duke of Braganza, whereas Princess of Beira was originally quite similar to that of French Madame Royale or the British Princess Royal. The title had no original connection to being one for next heirs of the throne - King John had a second son, and soon a third, but the daughter kept Beira and the boys received dukedoms (Braganza and Beja). However, Joanna died young in 1653.

Afterwards, the title kept granted and regranted several times during the remaining Portuguese monarchy. However, the precedent of being granted to the monarch's eldest daughter in a situation where he had several living sons, was repeated some times in later centuries.

The title's first connection with the position of the heir was from 1669 onwards, when it was held by to Infanta Isabel Luísa, Princess of Beira (1669–90), the only then living child of king Peter II. She received it as the eldest daughter of the king, but as she also was the heiress presumptive until 1688, a new tradition got its groundwork.

According to the first tradition, the next holder would be infanta Barbara of Portugal (1711–58), the eldest daughter of John V of Portugal. In 1729, she married with Infante Fernando of Spain, the Prince of Asturias.

Then, on December 17, 1734 the title was created anew by king John V of Portugal, in favour of his newborn eldest granddaughter Infanta Maria Francisca. She was the eldest daughter of the heir-apparent of the monarch. This was the first time when it was granted two generations down from the monarch. As the future Joseph I (the then Prince of Brazil) was to remain without sons, the new Princess of Beira would later become the proclaimed heiress and ultimately to ascend the throne.

In 1750 the newly-ascended Joseph I (believing that no sons would be forthcoming - and indeed, his wife and he produced no further issue after 1746, as we truly know with hindsight) proclaimed his eldest daughter the official heiress and granted her the "crown-princely" title Princess of Brazil (but apparently not that Duke of Braganza). He in 1761 further granted Maria's eldest son, Infante Dom José Francisco (1761–88) the title Prince of Beira. For the first time, the title was held by a male.

This created a new tradition. The situation now, effectively, was that the king's official heir held the Princedom of Brazil, and Prince of Beira was Brazil's heir-apparent. The situation had been the same (though unintentionally) during 1734-50, when the monarch's heir-apparent was Prince of Brazil, and Brazil's obvious heir was Princess of Beira. This was to repeat afterwards, as monarchs granted Beira to the second heir-apparent always when it was possible.

(The fashion how the titles Duke of Braganza and Prince of Brazil was held, is quite identical with that of Duchy of Cornwall and of Rothesay in the UK. The male heir apparent received it when the relevant parent ascended the throne, or if the title was vacant, at birth. During 1645-1822, the Prince of Brazil always belonged to the heir apparent of the throne, who also received the Duke of Braganza. In 1750 though, Brazil -but not Braganza- was specifically granted to the female heiress, as she was proclaimed the official successor.)

The future John VI himself never became Prince of Beira - he became directly Prince of Brazil and duke of Braganza at the death of his elder brother.

According to the first tradition, the next holder of Beira would be Infanta Mariana Vitória of Portugal (1768–88), the eldest daughter of Maria I and Pedro III. She deceased two months after her eldest brother. In 1785, she married with Infante Gabriel of Spain (1752–88) whom she pedeceased by some weeks. Their three children were granted Infantes of Portugal in addition to that of Spain by their grandmother. Others going extinct, the eldest son, Infante Pedro Carlos of Spain and Portugal (1786–1812) married his Portuguese cousin Teresa, Princess of Beira, and left issue (see below).

Queen Maria II and his regent, the future John VI, granted the Beira in turn to John's heirs-apparent, and the second of them, Infante Dom Pedro Francisco survived to become in 1816 the Prince of Brazil, the last Portuguese heir-apparent to held that (as he himself later made Brazil independent).

John VI followed the first tradition also, and Beira was granted to his eldest daughter infanta dona Maria Teresa, firstly wife of her short-lived cousin Infante Pedro Carlos of Spain and Portugal and secondly of the first Carlist pretender, Infante don Carlos of Spain. Teresa's only child was her son with Pedro Carlos, Infante don Sebastian of Spain and Portugal (1811–75), from whom the dukes of Marchena, Durcal, Ansola and Hernani descend.

In the second tradition, when born in 1821, the then Prince of Brazil's eldest son João Carlos was granted Beira in 1821 after birth, he being the third in heir-apparent line, but he died next year, some months before Brazil's secession. Emperor Pedro's next son, born in 1825, received no title from Portugal.

According to the first tradition, the next holder would be Infanta Maria da Glória Joana (1819–53), the eldest daughter of Pedro IV. She however ascended the throne in 1826 as Maria II.

The second-tradition based need arose only in 1887, when Infante Dom Luís Filipe was born in the last years of his grandfather Luís I's reign. Luís Filipe was Prince of Beira 1887-89 and then succeeded his own father, the new king, as crown prince, becoming 21st Duke of Braganza.

Read more about this topic:  Prince Of Beira

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    I cannot be much pleased without an appearance of truth; at least of possibility—I wish the history to be natural though the sentiments are refined; and the characters to be probable, though their behaviour is excelling.
    Frances Burney (1752–1840)

    The history of philosophy is to a great extent that of a certain clash of human temperaments.
    William James (1842–1910)

    What is most interesting and valuable in it, however, is not the materials for the history of Pontiac, or Braddock, or the Northwest, which it furnishes; not the annals of the country, but the natural facts, or perennials, which are ever without date. When out of history the truth shall be extracted, it will have shed its dates like withered leaves.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)