Worked Example
Suppose the fecal occult blood (FOB) screen test is used in 2030 people to look for bowel cancer:
| Patients with bowel cancer (as confirmed on endoscopy) |
||||
| Condition Positive | Condition Negative | |||
| Fecal Occult Blood Screen Test Outcome |
Test Outcome Positive |
True Positive (TP) = 20 |
False Positive (FP) = 180 |
Positive predictive value
= TP / (TP + FP) = 20 / (20 + 180) = 10% |
| Test Outcome Negative |
False Negative (FN) = 10 |
True Negative (TN) = 1820 |
Negative predictive value
= TN / (FN + TN) = 1820 / (10 + 1820) ≈ 99.5% |
|
| Sensitivity
= TP / (TP + FN) = 20 / (20 + 10) ≈ 67% |
Specificity
= TN / (FP + TN) = 1820 / (180 + 1820) = 91% |
|||
The small positive predictive value (PPV = 10%) indicates that many of the positive results from this testing procedure are false positives. Thus it will be necessary to follow up any positive result with a more reliable test to obtain a more accurate assessment as to whether cancer is present. Nevertheless, such a test may be useful if it is inexpensive and convenient. The strength of the FOB screen test is instead in its negative predictive value - which, if negative for an individual, gives us a high confidence that its negative result is true.
Read more about this topic: Positive Predictive Value
Famous quotes containing the word worked:
“I do not want to be covetous, but I think I speak the minds of many a wife and mother when I say I would willingly work as hard as possible all day and all night, if I might be sure of a small profit, but have worked hard for twenty-five years and have never known what it was to receive a financial compensation and to have what was really my own.”
—Emma Watrous, U.S. inventor. As quoted in Feminine Ingenuity, ch. 8, by Anne L. MacDonald (1992)
“Detection is, or ought to be, an exact science, and should be treated in the same cold and unemotional manner. You have attempted to tinge it with romanticism, which produces much the same effect as if you worked a love-story or an elopement into the fifth proposition of Euclid.”
—Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (1859–1930)