Percolation Threshold - Thresholds For 2D Continuum Models

Thresholds For 2D Continuum Models

System Φc ηc nc
Disks of radius r 0.67634831(2), 0.6763475(6), 0.676339(4) 1.12808737(6), 1.128085(2), 1.128059(12) 1.436322(2), 1.436289(16)
Aligned squares of side 0.66674349(3), 0.66653(1), 0.6666(4) 1.09884280(9), 1.0982(3), 1.098(1)
Randomly oriented squares 0.62554075(4), 0.6254(2) 0.9822723(1), 0.9819(6)
Ellipses of aspect ratio 2 0.63 0.76 1.94
Ellipses of aspect ratio 5 0.455 0.607 3.864
Ellipses of aspect ratio 10 0.301 0.358 4.56
Ellipses of aspect ratio 20 0.178 0.196 4.99
Ellipses of aspect ratio 50 0.081 0.084 5.38
Ellipses of aspect ratio 100 0.0417 0.0426 5.42
Ellipses of aspect ratio 1000 0.0043 0.00431 5.5
Sticks of length 5.6372858(6), 5.63726(2)
Disks with x=2.05* 0.993(1) 4.90(1) 0.0380(6)
Disks with x=2.25 0.8591(5) 1.959(5) 0.06930(12)
Disks with x=2.50 0.7836(4) 1.5307(17) 0.09745(11)
Disks with x=4.00 0.69543(6) 1.18853(19) 0.18916(3)
Disks with x=5.00 0.68643(13) 1.1597(3) 0.22149(8)
Disks with x=6.00 0.68241(8) 1.1470(1) 0.24340(5)
Disks with x=7.00 0.6803(8) 1.140(6) 0.25933(16)
Disks with x=8.00 0.67917(9) 1.1368(5) 0.27140(7)
Disks with x=9.00 0.67856(12) 1.1349(4) 0.28098(9)
Voids around disks of radius r 0.159(2)

equals critical total area for disks, where N is the number of objects and L is the system size.

for ellipses of semi-major and semi-minor axes of a and b, respectively. Aspect ratio

for squares.

* for disks with power in, .

equals critical area fraction.

equals number of objects of length per unit area.

For ellipses,

For void percolation, is the critical void fraction.

For more ellipse values, see

Read more about this topic:  Percolation Threshold

Famous quotes containing the words continuum and/or models:

    The further jazz moves away from the stark blue continuum and the collective realities of Afro-American and American life, the more it moves into academic concert-hall lifelessness, which can be replicated by any middle class showing off its music lessons.
    Imamu Amiri Baraka (b. 1934)

    French rhetorical models are too narrow for the English tradition. Most pernicious of French imports is the notion that there is no person behind a text. Is there anything more affected, aggressive, and relentlessly concrete than a Parisan intellectual behind his/her turgid text? The Parisian is a provincial when he pretends to speak for the universe.
    Camille Paglia (b. 1947)