Theoretical Definition
A function f: {0, 1}* → {0, 1}* is one-way if f can be computed by a polynomial time algorithm, but for every randomized algorithm A which runs in time polynomial in |x|, every polynomial p(n), and all sufficiently large n
where the probability is over the choice of x from the uniform distribution on {0, 1}n, and the randomness of A.
Note that, by this definition, the function must be "hard to invert" in the average-case, rather than worst-case sense. This is different from much of complexity theory (e.g., NP-hardness), where the term "hard" is meant in the worst-case.
It is not sufficient to make a function "lossy" (not one-to-one) to have a one-way function. In particular, the function which outputs the string of n zeros on any input of length n is not a one-way function. The reason is that an algorithm A which just outputs any string of length n on input f(x) does find a proper preimage of the output, even if it is not the input which was originally used to find the output string.
Read more about this topic: One-way Function
Famous quotes containing the words theoretical and/or definition:
“Post-structuralism is among other things a kind of theoretical hangover from the failed uprising of ‘68Ma way of keeping the revolution warm at the level of language, blending the euphoric libertarianism of that moment with the stoical melancholia of its aftermath.”
—Terry Eagleton (b. 1943)
“According to our social pyramid, all men who feel displaced racially, culturally, and/or because of economic hardships will turn on those whom they feel they can order and humiliate, usually women, children, and animals—just as they have been ordered and humiliated by those privileged few who are in power. However, this definition does not explain why there are privileged men who behave this way toward women.”
—Ana Castillo (b. 1953)