New Zealand Human Rights Act 1993

New Zealand Human Rights Act 1993

Status: Current legislation

The Human Rights Act 1993 is an Act of the Parliament of New Zealand which deals with discrimination. It was a consolidation and amendment of the Race Relations Act 1971 and the Human Rights Commission Act 1977. It passed into law 1 February 1994. The Act governs the work of the New Zealand Human Rights Commission.

It also outlawed discrimination on a wide variety of grounds, including:

  1. Sex (including pregnancy and childbirth)
  2. Marital status
  3. Religious belief
  4. Ethical belief
  5. Colour
  6. Race
  7. Ethnic or national origins
  8. Disability
  9. Age
  10. Political opinion
  11. Employment status
  12. Family status
  13. Sexual orientation

There are a significant number of caveats, including "genuine occupational qualification," "domestic employment in a private household," "to preserve reasonable standards of privacy," "national security" and "organised religion."

New Zeland Human Rights Act of 1993 do not explicitly prohibits discrimination on the basis of gender identity, and the Human Rights Commission, supported by the gouvernment's legal office, has always accepted complaints of discrimination based on gender identity on the ground of sex. However, the desicion to interpret the prohibition of discrimination based on sex to also cover discrimination based on gender identity is easily reversed. But an important dimention of the exercise undertaken by the Commission in New Zealand was toward the empowerment of trans people, referencing the Yogyakarta Principles. In effect the Commission was responding to one of the Yogyakarta Principles' Additional Recommendations to national human rights institutions that integrate the promotion of human rights of persons of diverse sexual orientations and gender identities into their work.

Read more about New Zealand Human Rights Act 1993:  See Also

Famous quotes containing the words zealand, human, rights and/or act:

    Teasing is universal. Anthropologists have found the same fundamental patterns of teasing among New Zealand aborigine children and inner-city kids on the playgrounds of Philadelphia.
    Lawrence Kutner (20th century)

    A dramatist is one who believes that the pure event, an action involving human beings, is more arresting than any comment that can be made upon it.
    Thornton Wilder (1897–1975)

    Unless democracy is to commit suicide by consenting to its own destruction, it will have to find some formidable answer to those who come to it saying: “I demand from you in the name of your principles the rights which I shall deny to you later in the name of my principles.”
    Walter Lippmann (1889–1974)

    Once women begin to question the inevitability of their subordination and to reject the conventions formerly associated with it, they can no longer retreat to the safety of those conventions. The woman who rejects the stereotype of feminine weakness and dependence can no longer find much comfort in the cliché that all men are beasts. She has no choice except to believe, on the contrary, that men are human beings, and she finds it hard to forgive them when they act like animals.
    Christopher Lasch (b. 1932)