Season-by-season Record
Note: GP = Games played, W = Wins, L = Losses, T = Ties, Pts = Points, GF = Goals for, GA = Goals against, PIM = Penalties in minutes
| Season | GP | W | L | T | Pts | GF | GA | PIM | Finish | Playoffs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1924–25 | 30 | 9 | 19 | 2 | 20 | 45 | 65 | 264 | fifth, NHL | Out of playoffs |
| 1925–26 | 36 | 20 | 11 | 5 | 45 | 91 | 73 | 554 | second, NHL | Won Semifinals (Pittsburgh) Won Finals (Ottawa) Won Stanley Cup (Victoria) |
| 1926–27 | 44 | 20 | 20 | 4 | 44 | 71 | 68 | 716 | third, Canadian | Lost Quarterfinals (Montreal) |
| 1927–28 | 44 | 24 | 14 | 6 | 54 | 96 | 77 | 549 | second, Canadian | Won Quarterfinals (Ottawa) Won Semifinals (Montreal) Lost Finals (NY Rangers) |
| 1928–29 | 44 | 15 | 20 | 9 | 39 | 67 | 65 | 638 | fifth, Canadian | Out of playoffs |
| 1929–30 | 44 | 23 | 16 | 5 | 51 | 141 | 114 | 651 | first, Canadian | Lost Semifinals (Boston) |
| 1930–31 | 44 | 20 | 18 | 6 | 46 | 105 | 106 | 568 | third, Canadian | Lost Quarterfinals (NY Rangers) |
| 1931–32 | 48 | 19 | 22 | 7 | 45 | 142 | 139 | 593 | third, Canadian | Won Quarterfinals (Detroit) Lost Semifinals (Toronto) |
| 1932–33 | 48 | 22 | 20 | 6 | 50 | 135 | 119 | 442 | second, Canadian | Lost Quarterfinals (Detroit) |
| 1933–34 | 48 | 19 | 18 | 11 | 49 | 117 | 122 | 414 | third, Canadian | Won Quarterfinals (NY Rangers) Lost Semifinals (Chicago) |
| 1934–35 | 48 | 24 | 19 | 5 | 53 | 123 | 92 | 380 | second, Canadian | Won Quarterfinals (Chicago) Won Semifinals (NY Rangers) Won Stanley Cup (Toronto) |
| 1935–36 | 48 | 22 | 16 | 10 | 54 | 114 | 106 | 504 | first, Canadian | Lost Semifinals (Detroit) |
| 1936–37 | 48 | 22 | 17 | 9 | 53 | 126 | 110 | 379 | second, Canadian | Lost Quarterfinals (Boston) |
| 1937–38 | 48 | 12 | 30 | 6 | 30 | 101 | 149 | 470 | fourth, Canadian | Out of playoffs |
| Totals | 622 | 271 | 260 | 91 | 633 | 1474 | 1405 | 7122 |
Read more about this topic: Montreal Maroons
Famous quotes containing the word record:
“Yesterday the Electoral Commission decided not to go behind the papers filed with the Vice-President in the case of Florida.... I read the arguments in the Congressional Record and can’t see how lawyers can differ on the question. But the decision is by a strictly party vote—eight Republicans against seven Democrats! It shows the strength of party ties.”
—Rutherford Birchard Hayes (1822–1893)