Meeting For Sufferings - Structure

Structure

Most members are appointed by Yearly Meeting, based on nominations put forward by each monthly meeting or by Meeting for Suffering's own standing committees. It may also co-opt a few members on its own initiative. Members normally serve a three-year term - the next round of appointments is in 2006. The table below shows the role of the relevant committees that provide members, as of 1999.

Number Origin
170 Monthly meetings
10 Co-opted
2 Young Friends General Meeting
2 Quaker Communications Central Committee
Responsible for publicity, media and government liaison, and income from grants and legacies.
2 Quaker Finance and Property Central Committee
Financial management and planning.
2 Quaker Home Service Central Committee
Local and national outreach, supporting pastoral work.
2 Quaker Peace and Service Central Committee
Working for peace and social justice.
2 Quaker Resources for Service Central Committee
Administrative support, including personnel and IT services.
2 Quaker Social Responsibility and Education Central Committee
Advice and support for concerns (individual vocation to carry out some service) and social projects.
1 Quaker Committee for Christian and Interfaith Relations
Relations with non-Quaker groups.
1 Quaker World Relations Committee
Relations with non-British Yearly Meetings and Friends World Committee for Consultation.
Total 196, plus a clerk and assistant clerk.

Various officers of Yearly Meeting, and staff employed by Meeting for Sufferings, also attend.

Read more about this topic:  Meeting For Sufferings

Famous quotes containing the word structure:

    I’m a Sunday School teacher, and I’ve always known that the structure of law is founded on the Christian ethic that you shall love the Lord your God and your neighbor as yourself—a very high and perfect standard. We all know the fallibility of man, and the contentions in society, as described by Reinhold Niebuhr and many others, don’t permit us to achieve perfection.
    Jimmy Carter (James Earl Carter, Jr.)

    There is no such thing as a language, not if a language is anything like what many philosophers and linguists have supposed. There is therefore no such thing to be learned, mastered, or born with. We must give up the idea of a clearly defined shared structure which language-users acquire and then apply to cases.
    Donald Davidson (b. 1917)

    The question is still asked of women: “How do you propose to answer the need for child care?” That is an obvious attempt to structure conflict in the old terms. The questions are rather: “If we as a human community want children, how does the total society propose to provide for them?”
    Jean Baker Miller (20th century)