Matilda (1996 Film) - Differences From The Novel

Differences From The Novel

The film is a modernized and Americanized version of Roald Dahl's novel of eight years earlier. Various plot points are shortened or removed, while new details and action sequences are added.

  • There are some changes in characters' motivations; for example, in the novel, Matilda's pranks against her father are purely done as acts of revenge. However, in the film, she gets the idea that when a person is bad, he or she has to be taught a lesson, and interprets this as justification for punishing her parents. In the novel, she plays three tricks on her parents, such as mixing her mother's hair bleach with her father's hair dye, hiding a parrot in the chimney tricking the family into thinking there is a burglar in the house, and putting superglue in her father's hat. In the film, she only plays two tricks, the hair dye (with her replacing it with hydrogen peroxide), and the glue-in-the-hat tricks, with both being done on the same day.
  • In the novel, Matilda's father destroys the library book The Red Pony by John Steinbeck out of pure malice and that he thinks American authors are morally bankrupt, while in the film, the book he destroys is Moby Dick by Herman Melville, and his reasons for doing so are that he thinks it is trash due to the title (possibly due to the film being set in America).
  • In the novel, Mrs. Wormwood is described and illustrated as being tall and podgy, and Mr. Wormwood is described and illustrated as being small and wiry. In the film, their body shapes are reversed, but their heights are still the same as in the novel.
  • Smaller changes are those of ages, TV programs and the like; Matilda's brother, Michael, is turned from an ordinary boy into a bullying child, and her mother shows some humanity by giving her away because she is better suited to a life with Miss Honey, while in the novel, both parents drop her without a second thought.
  • In the film, the school's name is "Crunchem Hall Elementary School" while it is named "Crunchem Hall Primary School" in the novel.
  • Matilda's mother is named "Zinnia" in the film, as she has no name in the novel. Also, Amanda Thripp is ten years old in the novel, but is Matilda's age and in Miss Honey's class in the film. In addition to this, there is no Nigel, Rupert, Eric, or Wilfred in the film. However there is a scene in which Miss Trunchbull holds a boy upside down by his ankle as she does with Wilfred in the novel. This boy also appears to have long hair as Rupert does in the novel. Miss Trunchbull also drops the boy on the floor like she does with Rupert and Wilfred in the novel.
  • In the film, it is revealed that Miss Trunchbull is superstitious, but this is not mentioned in the novel.
  • At the end of the film, Miss Honey is made the new principal after Miss Trunchbull vanishes; in the novel, however, the job goes to Mr. Trilby, the sympathetic Deputy Head, who has a minor role in the novel and does not appear in the film at all.
  • In the film, when Mr. Wormwood sells Miss Trunchbull a car, it shows them talking. In the novel, it does not. Also, in the novel, when Miss Trunchbull says she is glad she was never a child, she says it in Miss Honey's classroom. In the film, she says it when Mr. Wormwood sells her the car. In the film, the car he sold to her was a barely functional red and black 1970 Buick Electra 225 sedan. In the novel, she jokes to Miss Honey that he sold her a car that was almost new, and previously owned by a woman who drove it once a year and had 10,000 miles (in actuality, it was doctored by him using a drill).
  • In the film, Matilda's psychokinesis is treated more as a conventional superpower and less as a miracle. Also, she only uses her telekinetic powers after remembering all the mean things her family and Miss Trunchbull have said to her or about her. In the novel, she rigorously practices her psychokinetic powers, which leaves her mentally drained. She also loses them after the incident with Miss Trunchbull. In the film, she still has them in the end, but almost never uses them. The final confrontation with Miss Trunchbull is turned into a match of physical force versus mental powers. In contrast, characters in the novel have a sense of awe at supernatural forces whereas in the film, they are unaffected by these. In the novel, when Matilda attempts to show Miss Honey her powers, she does it sitting at her desk. Then she knocks over the glass with ease, without telling it to tip. In the film, she fails to lift it, however she manages to lift the pitcher later in the film to show Miss Honey her powers. In the film she practices them by moving every loose object around the house, such as playing cards and poker chips, however in the novel she steals one of her father's cigars and practices them with it alone.
  • Miss Honey's story about her childhood remains the same. However, the nickname her father used in the novel is "Jenny", while in the film, he called her "Bumblebee". In the film, her father has chocolates which he shared with her as a girl, and she had a doll which she called "Liccy", likely a reference to author Dahl's wife, Liccy, a coproducer of the film. She has none of these items in the novel. In the film, they visit Miss Trunchbull's house while she is temporarily gone. In the novel, they never visited it.
  • Hortensia has a boil on her nose and is eating potato chips in the novel. She does not have or do either in the film. She is also revealed to have done bad deeds to Miss Trunchbull in the novel. She never does this in the film, although she mentions that she has been put in the Chokey twice. When she meets Matilda and Lavender in the novel, it is at a time when Matilda has settled in at school. In the film, she meets them when Matilda walks around the playground. In the novel, she repeatedly insults Matilda and Lavender and is a bully, while she is friendly and protective over them in the film.
  • Lavender catches the newt all by herself in the novel; she was with Matilda, Bruce, and Hortensia in the film when she did so, and mistook it for a frog. When Miss Trunchbull throws it out to the class, it falls on a light, then a boy catches it. In the novel, it landed right next to Lavender's desk, and she put it in her pencil box.
  • In the novel, when Miss Honey asks the class if they know their multiplication tables, Matilda is the only one to raise her hand. In the film, the whole class knows them, Matilda's special ability is discovered when Miss Honey jokes that they could soon solve 13x379, which she solves immediately.
  • There is a large food fight between the students and Miss Trunchbull near the end of the film, while there isn't one in the novel. Miss Trunchbull faints in one of the students in the novel, and is carried out of the classroom. In the film, she flees after the food fight.
  • Miss Trunchbull's violence and cruelty towards children is slightly mitigated in the film. When she hurls Amanda Thripp into the air, she lands safely gathering flowers (however narrowly missing a spiked fence) in the film. In the novel, she bounces three times but ultimately trots back to the playground. In the film, Matilda is locked in the Chokey while it is only described in the novel. In the scene where Miss Trunchbull throws the boy out of the window, he was eating two M&M's during a literature class. In the novel, he was eating licorice during a Bible study class. In another scene, after Bruce Bogtrotter successfully eats an entire chocolate cake in one sitting without throwing up or getting a stomachache, Miss Trunchbull then demands that everyone stay for five extra hours after school and copy from the dictionary as punishment, while in the novel, she tells them furiously to leave the assembly hall.
  • The sub-plot about Mr. Wormwood's shady deals landing him in trouble with the police is hardly mentioned at all in the novel, but in the film, it is expanded and built upon; Matilda notices the two FBI agents spying on them and repeatedly tries to tell her family without any of them believing her that they are (reiterating that no one takes any notice of her despite her trying to help them) cops, with her parents insisting that they are speedboat salesmen. She even comes into direct confrontation with them on one occasion, when they are searching the family garage for stolen car parts. She confronts them for searching without a warrant. When they offer her a chance to cooperate with them against her father, she takes the handbrake off their car, causing it to roll off, and them to end their search prematurely. When the Wormwoods are found out to have used car parts, the locations they move to were different in both the novel and the film: it was Spain in the novel and Guam in the film.
  • In the novel, Matilda ran home to find out they were moving. In the film, they dropped by Miss Honey's house and told her that they were doing so.
  • In the novel, the Wormwoods' car seen at the very end was a black Mercedes-Benz saloon. In the film, it were a red Chrysler LeBaron convertible and a faded green Ford LTD station wagon, the latter being the getaway vehicle.
  • In the novel, Mrs. Wormwood simply asks her husband for permission to allow Matilda to live with Miss Honey, while in the film, they need to sign official legal adoption forms, which were xeroxed from a book. At the end of the novel, Michael is the only family member to say goodbye to Matilda when the family flees the country, but in the film, her mother is the one who does so.
  • In the novel, Miss Trunchbull only has a riding-crop when she makes Bruce Bogtrotter eat the cake. In the film, she has it throughout the entire film.

Read more about this topic:  Matilda (1996 film)

Famous quotes containing the word differences:

    Generally there is no consistent evidence of significant differences in school achievement between children of working and nonworking mothers, but differences that do appear are often related to maternal satisfaction with her chosen role, and the quality of substitute care.
    Ruth E. Zambrana, U.S. researcher, M. Hurst, and R.L. Hite. “The Working Mother in Contemporary Perspectives: A Review of Literature,” Pediatrics (December 1979)