Material Conditional

A material conditional (also known as "material implication", "material consequence", or simply "implication") is a logical connective often symbolized by a forward arrow "→". A single statement formed from the connection of two, for instance "pq" (called a conditional statement) is typically interpreted as "If p, then q" or "q if p". The material implication between two sentences p, q is typically symbolized as

  1. ;
  2. ;
  3. (Although this symbol is often used for logical consequence (i.e. logical implication) rather than for material implication.)

As placed within the material conditionals above, p is known as the antecedent, and q as the consequent, of the conditional. One can also use compounds as components, for example pq → (rs). There, the compound pq (short for "p and q") is the antecedent, and the compound rs is the consequent, of the larger conditional of which those compounds are components.

Implication is a form of logical consequence. For instance, in an argument such as "Fred is Mike's brother's son. Therefore Fred is Mike's nephew" the statement "Fred is Mike's nephew." is a material consequence of "Fred is Mike's brother's son," not a formal consequence. The validity of the argument depends on the the meanings of the words "Fred," "Mike," "brother," "son," and "nephew," not the logical form of the argument.

In classical logic, the compound pq is equivalent to the negative compound: not (both p and not q). In everyday English, saying "It is false that if p then q" is not often taken as flatly equivalent to saying "p is true and q is false" but, when used within classical logic, those phrasings are taken as logically equivalent. (Other senses of English "if...then..." require other logical forms.)

Read more about Material Conditional:  Definitions of The Material Conditional, Formal Properties, Philosophical Problems With Material Conditional

Famous quotes containing the words material and/or conditional:

    It is not stressful circumstances, as such, that do harm to children. Rather, it is the quality of their interpersonal relationships and their transactions with the wider social and material environment that lead to behavioral, emotional, and physical health problems. If stress matters, it is in terms of how it influences the relationships that are important to the child.
    Felton Earls (20th century)

    Computer mediation seems to bathe action in a more conditional light: perhaps it happened; perhaps it didn’t. Without the layered richness of direct sensory engagement, the symbolic medium seems thin, flat, and fragile.
    Shoshana Zuboff (b. 1951)