Life Against Death
Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History is a book by American classicist Norman O. Brown, first published in 1959, with a second edition in 1985. A radical analysis and critique of the work of Sigmund Freud, it tries to provide a theoretical rationale for a nonrepressive civilization, and has been compared to works such as Frankfurt school philosopher Herbert Marcuse's Eros and Civilization and French philosopher Michel Foucault's Madness and Civilization. It explores parallels between psychoanalysis and Martin Luther's theology, and also draws on revolutionary themes in western religious thought, especially the body mysticism of Jakob Böhme and William Blake. The result of an interest in psychoanalysis that began when Marcuse suggested to Brown that he should read Freud, Life Against Death became famous when Norman Podhoretz recommended it to Lionel Trilling. Though it has been called one of the great nonfiction works of the 20th century, some critics have found it of lesser weight than Marcuse's work. It has been suggested that, despite its objectives, the book's arguments imply that sexual repression is biologically inevitable. Brown wrote that his subsequent book Love's Body was written to confuse any followers he acquired due to Life Against Death and destroy its positions.
Read more about Life Against Death: Background, Synopsis, Critical Evaluations, Brown's View, Influence
Famous quotes containing the words life and/or death:
“The earth is not a mere fragment of dead history, stratum upon stratum like the leaves of a book, to be studied by geologists and antiquaries chiefly, but living poetry like the leaves of a tree, which precede flowers and fruit,—not a fossil earth, but a living earth; compared with whose great central life all animal and vegetable life is merely parasitic.”
—Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)
“American family life has never been particularly idyllic. In the nineteenth century, nearly a quarter of all children experienced the death of one of their parents.... Not until the sixties did the chief cause of separation of parents shift from death to divorce.”
—Richard Louv (20th century)