Summary
Due to Kazakhstan's spring-fall league system, Kazakh clubs are able to start their European campaign only for the next season. Current club allocation is as following: 1 club (champion) for Champions League 2nd qualifying round, 3 clubs (league runner-up, 3rd placed team and cup winner for Europa League 1st qualifying round.
| Season | UEFA Season | Coeff | Champions | Runner-up | 3rd place | 4th place | 5th place | 9th place | Cup winner | Cup runner-up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 | 2002-03 | 0.500 | Astana-64 (Zhenis) | Atyrau | Tobol1 | Kairat | Astana-64 | |||
| 2002 | 2003-04 | 0.167 | Irtysh | Atyrau | Tobol | Astana-64 (Zhenis) | Irtysh | |||
| 20032 | 2004-05 | 0.000 | Irtysh | Tobol | Astana-64 (Zhenis) | Kairat | Tobol | |||
| 20043 | 2005-06 | 1.000 | Kairat | Irtysh | Tobol | Taraz | Kairat | |||
| 2005 | 2006-07 | 0.667 | Aktobe | Tobol | Kairat | Shakhter | Astana-64 (Zhenis)4 | Kairat | ||
| 2006 | 2007-08 | 0.750 | Astana-64 (Astana) | Aktobe | Tobol | Almaty | Astana-64 | |||
| 2007 | 2008-09 | 0.833 | Aktobe | Tobol | Shakhter | Irtysh4 | Zhetysu | Tobol | Ordabasy | |
| 20085 | 2009-10 | 1.125 | Aktobe | Tobol | Irtysh | Kaisar | Megasport | Okzhetpes6 | Aktobe | Almaty |
| 2009 | 2010-11 | 0.875 | Aktobe | Astana (Lokomotiv)4 | Shakhter | Tobol | Atyrau | Shakhter | ||
| 2010 | 2011-12 | 1.625 | Tobol | Aktobe | Irtysh | Astana (Lokomotiv)4 | Shakhter | |||
| 2011 | 2012-13 | 0.875 | Shakhter | Zhetysu | Aktobe | Ordabasy | Tobol |
Key to colours
| Champions League | UEFA Cup / Europa League | Intertoto Cup |
|---|
Notes
Read more about this topic: Kazakhstan Football Clubs In European Cups
Famous quotes containing the word summary:
“Product of a myriad various minds and contending tongues, compact of obscure and minute association, a language has its own abundant and often recondite laws, in the habitual and summary recognition of which scholarship consists.”
—Walter Pater (1839–1894)
“I have simplified my politics into an utter detestation of all existing governments; and, as it is the shortest and most agreeable and summary feeling imaginable, the first moment of an universal republic would convert me into an advocate for single and uncontradicted despotism. The fact is, riches are power, and poverty is slavery all over the earth, and one sort of establishment is no better, nor worse, for a people than another.”
—George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)