Plot
Jungle Strike features two antagonists: Ibn Kilbaba, son of Desert Strike's antagonist, and Carlos Ortega, a "notorious South American drug lord". The opening sequence depicts these characters observing a nuclear explosion on a deserted island, while discussing the delivery of "nuclear resources" and an attack on Washington D.C.. Kilbaba seeks revenge for his father's death at the hands of the US while Ortega wishes to "teach the Yankees to stay out of my drug trade". The player takes control of a "lone special forces" pilot. The game's first level depicts the protagonist repelling terrorist attacks on Washington, D.C.. Subsequent levels depict counter-attacks on the drug lord's forces, progressing towards his "jungle fortress". In the game's penultimate level, the player pursues the two antagonists to their respective hideouts before capturing them. The final level takes places in Washington, D.C. as the drug lord's private army again attacks the city while the two antagonists attempt to flee. The game ends after the player has destroyed both enemies and saved the city from destruction. The ending sequence depicts the protagonist and his co-pilot in an open-topped car in front of cheering crowds. The PC version contains an extra level set in Alaska.
Read more about this topic: Jungle Strike
Famous quotes containing the word plot:
“We have defined a story as a narrative of events arranged in their time-sequence. A plot is also a narrative of events, the emphasis falling on causality. “The king died and then the queen died” is a story. “The king died, and then the queen died of grief” is a plot. The time sequence is preserved, but the sense of causality overshadows it.”
—E.M. (Edward Morgan)
“The plot was most interesting. It belonged to no particular age, people, or country, and was perhaps the more delightful on that account, as nobody’s previous information could afford the remotest glimmering of what would ever come of it.”
—Charles Dickens (1812–1870)
“James’s great gift, of course, was his ability to tell a plot in shimmering detail with such delicacy of treatment and such fine aloofness—that is, reluctance to engage in any direct grappling with what, in the play or story, had actually “taken place”Mthat his listeners often did not, in the end, know what had, to put it in another way, “gone on.””
—James Thurber (1894–1961)