International Reactions To The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons Controversy

International Reactions To The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons Controversy

The publication of satirical cartoons of the Islamic prophet Muhammad in the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten on September 30, 2005 led to violence, arrests, inter-governmental tensions, and debate about the scope of free speech and the place of Muslims in the West. Many Muslims claim that any image of Muhammad is blasphemous, while many Westerners have defended the right of free speech. A number of governments, organizations, and individuals have issued statements defining their stance on the protests or cartoons. This article details the reactions of international organisations and countries, as well as detailing events surrounding the publication. For the opinions of individuals and other organisations please see Opinions on the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy. For a detailed, chronological account of the controversy please see Timeline of the Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy.

Jyllands–Posten
Muhammad cartoons
controversy
Events and reactions
Timeline
Cartoon descriptions
Akkari-Laban dossier
Newspaper reprints
International reactions
Opinions
Principal parties
Jyllands-Posten
Islamisk Trossamfund
Denmark
Muslim world

Read more about International Reactions To The Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons Controversy:  Political Reactions, Violent Protests

Famous quotes containing the words reactions and/or controversy:

    Separation anxiety is normal part of development, but individual reactions are partly explained by experience, that is, by how frequently children have been left in the care of others.... A mother who is never apart from her young child may be saying to him or her subliminally: “You are only safe when I’m with you.”
    Cathy Rindner Tempelsman (20th century)

    And therefore, as when there is a controversy in an account, the parties must by their own accord, set up for right Reason, the Reason of some Arbitrator, or Judge, to whose sentence, they will both stand, or their controversy must either come to blows, or be undecided, for want of a right Reason constituted by Nature; so is it also in all debates of what kind soever.
    Thomas Hobbes (1579–1688)