Hurricane Marilyn - Economic Impact

Economic Impact

The exact figure for damages in the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico is not available, although the American Insurance Services Group set the combined damage at $875 million USD. However, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) estimated the damage cost as $1 billion USD while an economic research group in the U.S. Virgin Islands estimated the damage to be at $3 billion USD. As of 1995, the estimated damages to St. Thomas were set at $1.5 billion (1995 USD).

The economic impact to the islands was severe in St. John and particularly to St. Thomas, which are heavily dependent on tourism.

Aside from high winds and seas, one possible explanation for the storm's heavy damage may have been complacency on the part of local island populations. Marilyn followed on the heels of Luis, a more powerful Category 4 hurricane initially predicted to pass very close to St. Thomas. This prediction prompted locals to be particularly thorough in their pre-storm preparations; however, the hurricane passed further away from the island and caused relatively moderate damage. This may have caused islanders to prematurely relax, as Marilyn was a much smaller hurricane in appearance than Luis. Another factual reason was substantial difference in wind speed forecasts measured at sea-level, Cyril King Airport on St. Thomas and those measured on homes throughout the Island hillsides & broadcast from sites off the Island, such as Puerto Rico and the US Mainland. Sea-level Airport readings showed 75-85 MPH gusting winds, whereas measurements on hillside homes showed 100-130 MPH gusting winds, similar to Mainland wind forecasts. Some neighbors with hurricane devastated homes in St. Thomas compared wind charts of their homes'smashed wind meters indicating 120 - 140 MPH.

Read more about this topic:  Hurricane Marilyn

Famous quotes containing the words economic and/or impact:

    A society which is clamoring for choice, which is filled with many articulate groups, each urging its own brand of salvation, its own variety of economic philosophy, will give each new generation no peace until all have chosen or gone under, unable to bear the conditions of choice. The stress is in our civilization.
    Margaret Mead (1901–1978)

    Television does not dominate or insist, as movies do. It is not sensational, but taken for granted. Insistence would destroy it, for its message is so dire that it relies on being the background drone that counters silence. For most of us, it is something turned on and off as we would the light. It is a service, not a luxury or a thing of choice.
    David Thomson, U.S. film historian. America in the Dark: The Impact of Hollywood Films on American Culture, ch. 8, William Morrow (1977)