Human Rights in Mauritania

Human Rights in Mauritania is generally seen as poor according to international observers, including Freedom House, the United States Department of State, and Amnesty International.

With a July 2012 estimated population of 3.4 million, Mauritania is a highly centralized Islamic republic with no freedom of religion

Coming from French colonial rule, Mauritania was ethnically divided between Arabic speaking Berber tribal confederations of the north and sedentary black populations of the south, many of whom were traditionally bonded communities or enslaved individuals. The Mauritanian government has a history of discriminating against these Toucouleurs and Soninke people within its borders. One such example occurred in 1987, when the government imprisoned southerners and threw others out of the army, resulting in the Mauritania–Senegal Border War.

Amnesty International has accused the Mauritania legal system of functioning with a complete disregard of legal procedure, fair trial, or humane imprisonment. Amnesty International also has accused the Mauritanian government of an institutionalized and continuous use of torture for decades.

According to the constitution of Mauritania, international law prevails over domestic Mauritanian law as soon as the international law is published in the Official Gazette.

Read more about Human Rights In Mauritania:  Respect For Political Rights: The Right of Citizens To Change Their Government, Official Corruption and Government Transparency, Governmental Attitude Regarding International and Nongovernmental Investigation of Alleged Violation, Discrimination, Societal Abuses, and Trafficking in Persons, Freedom House Ratings of Mauritania, International Human Rights Treaties

Famous quotes containing the words human and/or rights:

    The peculiar evil of silencing the expression of an opinion is, that it is robbing the human race; posterity as well as the existing generation; those who dissent from the opinion, still more than those who hold it. If the opinion is right, they are deprived of the opportunity of exchanging error for truth: if wrong, they lose, what is almost as great a benefit, the clearer perception and livelier impression of truth, produced by its collision with error.
    John Stuart Mill (1806–1873)

    Close by the Rights of Man, at the least set beside them, are the Rights of the Spirit.
    Victor Hugo (1802–1885)