In mathematics, a Grothendieck universe is a set U with the following properties:
- If x is an element of U and if y is an element of x, then y is also an element of U. (U is a transitive set.)
- If x and y are both elements of U, then {x,y} is an element of U.
- If x is an element of U, then P(x), the power set of x, is also an element of U.
- If is a family of elements of U, and if I is an element of U, then the union is an element of U.
Elements of a Grothendieck universe are sometimes called small sets.
A Grothendieck universe is meant to provide a set in which all of mathematics can be performed. (In fact, uncountable Grothendieck universes provide models of set theory with the natural ∈-relation, natural powerset operation etc.) As an example, we will prove an easy proposition.
The axiom of Grothendieck universes says that every set is an element of a Grothendieck universe.
- Proposition. If and, then .
- Proof. because . because, so .
It is similarly easy to prove that any Grothendieck universe U contains:
- All singletons of each of its elements,
- All products of all families of elements of U indexed by an element of U,
- All disjoint unions of all families of elements of U indexed by an element of U,
- All intersections of all families of elements of U indexed by an element of U,
- All functions between any two elements of U, and
- All subsets of U whose cardinal is an element of U.
In particular, it follows from the last axiom that if U is non-empty, it must contain all of its finite subsets and a subset of each finite cardinality. One can also prove immediately from the definitions that the intersection of any class of universes is a universe.
The idea of universes is due to Alexander Grothendieck, who used them as a way of avoiding proper classes in algebraic geometry.
Read more about Grothendieck Universe: Grothendieck Universes and Inaccessible Cardinals
Famous quotes containing the word universe:
“In his comprehensive delight in all experience Dickens resembles Walt Whitman, but he was innocent of that nebulous transcendentalism that blurred Whitmans universe into vast misty panoramas and left him, for all his huge democratic vistas, unable to tell a story or paint a single concrete human being.”
—Edgar Johnson (19121990)