Golden Ratio Base - Representing Rational Numbers As Golden Ratio Base Numbers

Representing Rational Numbers As Golden Ratio Base Numbers

Every non-negative rational number can be represented as a recurring base-φ expansion, as can any non-negative element of the field Q = Q + √5Q, the field generated by the rational numbers and √5. Conversely any recurring (or terminating) base-φ expansion is a non-negative element of Q. Some examples (with spaces added for emphasis):

  • 1/2 ≈ 0.010 010 010 010 ... φ
  • 1/3 ≈ 0.00101000 00101000 00101000... φ
  • √5 = 10.1φ
  • 2+(1/13)√5 ≈ 10.010 1000100010101000100010000000 1000100010101000100010000000 1000100010101000100010000000 ...φ

The justification that a rational gives a recurring expansion is analogous to the equivalent proof for a base-n numeration system (n=2,3,4,...). Essentially in base-φ long division there are only a finite number of possible remainders, and so once there must be a recurring pattern. For example with 1/2 = 1/10.01φ = 100φ/1001φ long division looks like this (note that base-φ subtraction may be hard to follow at first):

.0 1 0 0 1 ________________________ 1 0 0 1 ) 1 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 trade: 10000 = 1100 = 1011 ------- so 10000-1001 = 1011-1001 = 10 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 ------- etc.

The converse is also true, in that a number with a recurring base-φ; representation is an element of the field Q. This follows from the observation that a recurring representation with period k involves a geometric series with ratio φ-k, which will sum to an element of Q.

Read more about this topic:  Golden Ratio Base

Famous quotes containing the words representing, rational, numbers, golden, ratio and/or base:

    ... today we round out the first century of a professed republic,—with woman figuratively representing freedom—and yet all free, save woman.
    Phoebe W. Couzins (1845–1913)

    No actual skeptic, so far as I know, has claimed to disbelieve in an objective world. Skepticism is not a denial of belief, but rather a denial of rational grounds for belief.
    William Pepperell Montague (1842–1910)

    He bundles every forkful in its place,
    And tags and numbers it for future reference,
    So he can find and easily dislodge it
    In the unloading. Silas does that well.
    He takes it out in bunches like birds’ nests.
    Robert Frost (1874–1963)

    The whole body of what is now called moral or ethical truth existed in the golden age as abstract science. Or, if we prefer, we may say that the laws of Nature are the purest morality.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    Personal rights, universally the same, demand a government framed on the ratio of the census: property demands a government framed on the ratio of owners and of owning.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Were I as base as is the lowly plain,
    And you, my Love, as high as heaven above,
    Yet should the thoughts of me, your humble swain,
    Ascend to heaven in honour of my love.
    Joshua Sylvester (1561–1618)