Fisher's Method - Relation To Stouffer's Z-score Method

Relation To Stouffer's Z-score Method

A closely related approach to Fisher's method is based on Z-scores rather than p-values. If we let Zi = Φ − 1(1−pi), where Φ is the standard normal cumulative distribution function, then

Z = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^k Z_i}{\sqrt{k}},

is a Z-score for the overall meta-analysis. This Z-score is appropriate for one-sided right-tailed p-values; minor modifications can be made if two-sided or left-tailed p-values are being analyzed. This method is named for the sociologist Samuel A. Stouffer.

Since Fisher's method is based on the average of −log(pi) values, and the Z-score method is based on the average of the Zi values, the relationship between these two approaches follows from the relationship between z and −log(p) = −log(1−Φ(z)). For the normal distribution, these two values are not perfectly linearly related, but they follow a highly linear relationship over the range of Z-values most often observed, from 1 to 5. As a result, the power of the Z-score method is nearly identical to the power of Fisher's method.

One advantage of the Z-score approach is that it is straightforward to introduce weights. If the ith Z-score is weighted by wi, then the meta-analysis Z-score is

Z = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^k w_iZ_i}{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}^k w_i^2}},

which follows a standard normal distribution under the null hypothesis. While weighted versions of Fisher's statistic can be derived, the null distribution becomes a weighted sum of independent chi-squared statistics, which is less convenient to work with.

Read more about this topic:  Fisher's Method

Famous quotes containing the words relation to, relation and/or method:

    “Whoever has a keen eye for profits, is blind in relation to his craft.”
    —Sophocles (497–406/5 B.C.)

    “Among the most valuable but least appreciated experiences parenthood can provide are the opportunities it offers for exploring, reliving, and resolving one’s own childhood problems in the context of one’s relation to one’s child.”
    —Bruno Bettelheim (20th century)

    “Unlike Descartes, we own and use our beliefs of the moment, even in the midst of philosophizing, until by what is vaguely called scientific method we change them here and there for the better. Within our own total evolving doctrine, we can judge truth as earnestly and absolutely as can be, subject to correction, but that goes without saying.”
    —Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)