Existence of God - Arguments Against The Existence of God

Arguments Against The Existence of God

Part of a series on
Atheism
Concepts
  • Antitheism
  • Atheism and religion
  • Criticism of atheism
  • Implicit and explicit atheism
  • Negative and positive atheism
History
  • History of atheism
  • New Atheism
  • State atheism
Arguments for atheism
  • Arguments against God's existence
  • Argument from free will
  • Argument from inconsistent revelations
  • Argument from nonbelief
  • Argument from poor design
  • Atheist's Wager
  • Fate of the unlearned
  • God of the gaps
  • Incompatible-properties argument
  • Oblivion
  • Omnipotence paradox
  • Problem of evil
  • Problem of Hell
  • Russell's teapot
  • Theological noncognitivism
  • Ultimate Boeing 747 gambit
People
  • Demographics
  • Discrimination / persecution of atheists
  • Notable atheists
Related concepts
Agnosticism
  • Agnostic theism
  • Agnostic atheism
  • Ignosticism
  • Apatheism
  • Weak agnosticism
  • Strong agnosticism
  • List of agnostics
Irreligion
  • Criticism of religion
  • Freethought
  • Freedom From Religion Foundation
  • Anti-clericalism
  • Antireligion
  • Parody religion
  • Post-theism
Naturalism
  • Humanistic
  • Metaphysical
  • Methodological
  • Religious
Secularism
  • Secularity
  • Secular Humanism
  • Secularist organizations
  • Portal
  • WikiProject

Each of the following arguments aims at showing either that a particular subset of gods do not exist (by showing them as inherently meaningless, contradictory, or at odds with known scientific or historical facts) or that there is insufficient reason to believe in them. Some of these arguments suggest that there is evidence of absence of a god.

Read more about this topic:  Existence Of God

Famous quotes containing the words arguments, existence and/or god:

    The conclusion suggested by these arguments might be called the paradox of theorizing. It asserts that if the terms and the general principles of a scientific theory serve their purpose, i. e., if they establish the definite connections among observable phenomena, then they can be dispensed with since any chain of laws and interpretive statements establishing such a connection should then be replaceable by a law which directly links observational antecedents to observational consequents.
    —C.G. (Carl Gustav)

    The dominant metaphor of conceptual relativism, that of differing points of view, seems to betray an underlying paradox. Different points of view make sense, but only if there is a common co-ordinate system on which to plot them; yet the existence of a common system belies the claim of dramatic incomparability.
    Donald Davidson (b. 1917)

    And he thought to himself...., ‘Soul, you have ample goods laid up for many years; relax, eat, drink, be merry.’ But God said to him, ‘You fool! This very night your life is being demanded of you. And the things you have prepared, whose will they be?’
    Bible: New Testament, Luke 12:17-20.