Equivalent Problems
Although the canonical exact cover problem involves a collection of subsets of a set X, the logic does not depend on the presence of subsets containing elements. An "abstract exact cover problem" arises whenever there is a binary relation between two sets P and Q and the goal is to select a subset P* of P such that each element in Q is related to exactly one element in P*. In general, the elements of P represent choices and the elements of Q represent "exactly one" constraints on those choices.
More formally, given a binary relation R P × Q between sets P and Q, one can call a subset P* of P an "abstract exact cover" of Q if each element in Q is R -1-related to exactly one element in P*. Here R -1 is the inverse of R.
In general, R -1 restricted to Q × P* is a function from Q to P*, which maps each element in Q to the unique element in P* that is R-related that element in Q. This function is onto, unless P* contains the "empty set," i.e., an element which isn't R-related to any element in Q.
In the canonical exact cover problem, P is a collection of subsets of X, Q is the set X, R is the binary relation "contains" between subsets and elements, and R -1 restricted to Q × P* is the function "is contained in" from elements to selected subsets.
Read more about this topic: Exact Cover
Famous quotes containing the words equivalent and/or problems:
“But then people don’t read literature in order to understand; they read it because they want to re-live the feelings and sensations which they found exciting in the past. Art can be a lot of things; but in actual practice, most of it is merely the mental equivalent of alcohol and cantharides.”
—Aldous Huxley (1894–1963)
“I’m no good at being noble, but it doesn’t take much to see that the problems of three little people don’t amount to a hill of beans in this crazy world. Someday you’ll understand that.”
—Julius J. Epstein, U.S. screenwriter, Philip Epstein, screenwriter, Howard Koch, screenwriter, and Michael Curtiz. Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bogart)