Emergy - Uses of Methodology

Uses of Methodology

The recognition of the relevance of energy to the growth and dynamics of all complex systems has resulted in increased emphasis on methods of environmental evaluation that can account for and interpret the effects of matter and energy flows, at all scales in systems of humanity and nature. The following table lists some general areas in which the emergy methodology has been employed.

Table 4. Fields of Study and Emergy Evalautions
Emergy and ecosystems
Self-organization (
Aquatic and marine ecosystems
Food webs and hierarchies
Ecosystem health
Forest ecosystems (
Complexity
Biodiversity
Emergy and Information
Diversity and information
Culture, Education, University
Emergy and Agriculture
Food production, agriculture
Livestock production
Agriculture and society
Soil erosion
Emergy and energy sources and carriers
Fossil fuels (
Renewable and nonrenewable electricity
Hydroelectric dams
Biofuels
Hydrogen
Emergy and the Economy
National and international analyses (
Trade
Environmental accounting
Development policies
Sustainability
Tourism (
Emergy and cities
Spatial organization and urban development
Urban metabolism
Transportation modes
Emergy and landscapes
Spatial empower, Land development indicators
Emergy in landforms
Watersheds
Emergy and ecological engineering
Restoration models
Reclamation projects
Artificial Ecosystems: wetlands, pond
Waste treatment
Emergy, material flows and recycling
Mining and minerals processing
Industrial production, ecodesign
Recycling pattern in human-dominated ecosystems
Emergy and thermodynamics
Efficiency and Power (O
Maximum Empower Principle
Pulsing paradigm
Thermodynamic principles
Emergy and systems modeling
Energy systems language and modeling
National sustainability
Sensitivity analysis, uncertainty (
Emergy and policy
Tools for decision makers
Conservation and economic value

Read more about this topic:  Emergy

Famous quotes containing the word methodology:

    One might get the impression that I recommend a new methodology which replaces induction by counterinduction and uses a multiplicity of theories, metaphysical views, fairy tales, instead of the customary pair theory/observation. This impression would certainly be mistaken. My intention is not to replace one set of general rules by another such set: my intention is rather to convince the reader that all methodologies, even the most obvious ones, have their limits.
    Paul Feyerabend (1924–1994)