Uses of Methodology
The recognition of the relevance of energy to the growth and dynamics of all complex systems has resulted in increased emphasis on methods of environmental evaluation that can account for and interpret the effects of matter and energy flows, at all scales in systems of humanity and nature. The following table lists some general areas in which the emergy methodology has been employed.
-
-
Table 4. Fields of Study and Emergy Evalautions Emergy and ecosystems - Self-organization (
- Aquatic and marine ecosystems
- Food webs and hierarchies
- Ecosystem health
- Forest ecosystems (
- Complexity
- Biodiversity
Emergy and Information - Diversity and information
- Culture, Education, University
Emergy and Agriculture - Food production, agriculture
- Livestock production
- Agriculture and society
- Soil erosion
Emergy and energy sources and carriers - Fossil fuels (
- Renewable and nonrenewable electricity
- Hydroelectric dams
- Biofuels
- Hydrogen
Emergy and the Economy - National and international analyses (
- Trade
- Environmental accounting
- Development policies
- Sustainability
- Tourism (
Emergy and cities - Spatial organization and urban development
- Urban metabolism
- Transportation modes
Emergy and landscapes - Spatial empower, Land development indicators
- Emergy in landforms
- Watersheds
Emergy and ecological engineering - Restoration models
- Reclamation projects
- Artificial Ecosystems: wetlands, pond
- Waste treatment
Emergy, material flows and recycling - Mining and minerals processing
- Industrial production, ecodesign
- Recycling pattern in human-dominated ecosystems
Emergy and thermodynamics - Efficiency and Power (O
- Maximum Empower Principle
- Pulsing paradigm
- Thermodynamic principles
Emergy and systems modeling - Energy systems language and modeling
- National sustainability
- Sensitivity analysis, uncertainty (
Emergy and policy - Tools for decision makers
- Conservation and economic value
-
Read more about this topic: Emergy
Famous quotes containing the word methodology:
“One might get the impression that I recommend a new methodology which replaces induction by counterinduction and uses a multiplicity of theories, metaphysical views, fairy tales, instead of the customary pair theory/observation. This impression would certainly be mistaken. My intention is not to replace one set of general rules by another such set: my intention is rather to convince the reader that all methodologies, even the most obvious ones, have their limits.”
—Paul Feyerabend (19241994)