Dominated Convergence Theorem - Discussion of The Assumptions

Discussion of The Assumptions

The assumption that the sequence is dominated by some integrable g can not be dispensed with. This may be seen as follows: define ƒ_n(x) = n for x in the interval (0, 1/n] and ƒ_n(x) = 0 otherwise. Any g which dominates the sequence must also dominate the pointwise supremum h = sup_n ƒ_n. Observe that

$\int_0^1 h(x)\,dx \ge \int_{1/m}^1{h(x)\,dx} = \sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \int_{\left(\frac1{n+1},\frac1n\right]}{n\,dx} = \sum_{n=1}^{m-1} \frac{1}{n+1} \to \infty \quad \text{as }m\to\infty$

by the divergence of the harmonic series. Hence, the monotonicity of the Lebesgue integral tells us that there exists no integrable function which dominates the sequence on . A direct calculation shows that integration and pointwise limit do not commute for this sequence:

$\int_0^1 \lim_{n\to\infty} f_n(x)\,dx = 0 \neq 1 = \lim_{n\to\infty}\int_0^1 f_n(x)\,dx,$

because the pointwise limit of the sequence is the zero function. Note that the sequence {ƒ_n} is not even uniformly integrable, hence also the Vitali convergence theorem is not applicable.

Read more about this topic: Dominated Convergence Theorem

Famous quotes containing the words discussion of, discussion and/or assumptions:

“There exist few things more tedious than a discussion of general ideas inflicted by author or reader upon a work of fiction.”
—Vladimir Nabokov (1899–1977)

“This is certainly not the place for a discourse about what festivals are for. Discussions on this theme were plentiful during that phase of preparation and on the whole were fruitless. My experience is that discussion is fruitless. What sets forth and demonstrates is the sight of events in action, is living through these events and understanding them.”
—Doris Lessing (b. 1919)

“Why did he think adding meant increase?
To me it was dilution. Where do these
Innate assumptions come from?”
—Philip Larkin (1922–1986)