Set Theory Definition
Formally, let {Ai : i ∈ I} be a family of sets indexed by I. The disjoint union of this family is the set
The elements of the disjoint union are ordered pairs (x, i). Here i serves as an auxiliary index that indicates which Ai the element x came from.
Each of the sets Ai is canonically isomorphic to the set
Through this isomorphism, one may consider that Ai is canonically embedded in the disjoint union. For i ≠ j, the sets Ai* and Aj* are disjoint even if the sets Ai and Aj are not.
In the extreme case where each of the Ai are equal to some fixed set A for each i ∈ I, the disjoint union is the Cartesian product of A and I:
One may occasionally see the notation
for the disjoint union of a family of sets, or the notation A + B for the disjoint union of two sets. This notation is meant to be suggestive of the fact that the cardinality of the disjoint union is the sum of the cardinalities of the terms in the family. Compare this to the notation for the Cartesian product of a family of sets.
Disjoint unions are also sometimes written or .
In the language of category theory, the disjoint union is the coproduct in the category of sets. It therefore satisfies the associated universal property. This also means that the disjoint union is the categorical dual of the Cartesian product construction. See coproduct for more details.
For many purposes, the particular choice of auxiliary index is unimportant, and in a simplifying abuse of notation, the indexed family can be treated simply as a collection of sets. In this case is referred to as a copy of and the notation is sometimes used.
Read more about this topic: Disjoint Union
Famous quotes containing the words set, theory and/or definition:
“Were it good
To set the exact wealth of all our states
All at one cast? to set so rich a main
On the nice hazard of one doubtful hour?
It were not good.”
—William Shakespeare (15641616)
“It is not enough for theory to describe and analyse, it must itself be an event in the universe it describes. In order to do this theory must partake of and become the acceleration of this logic. It must tear itself from all referents and take pride only in the future. Theory must operate on time at the cost of a deliberate distortion of present reality.”
—Jean Baudrillard (b. 1929)
“... we all know the wags definition of a philanthropist: a man whose charity increases directly as the square of the distance.”
—George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)



