Dependent Words
In Indo-European languages, a dependent clause usually begins with a dependent word. One kind of dependent word is a subordinating conjunction. Subordinating conjunctions are used to begin dependent clauses known as adverbial clauses, which act like adverbs. In the following examples, the adverbial clauses are bold and the subordinating conjunctions are italicized:
- Wherever she goes, she leaves a piece of luggage behind.
- (The adverbial clause wherever she goes modifies the verb leaves.)
- Rodge enjoyed the movie more than I did.
- (The adverbial clause than I did modifies the adverb more.)
A subordinating conjunction can also introduce a noun clause:
- I know that he likes me.
- (The noun clause that he likes me serves as the object of the main-clause verb know.)
Another type of dependent word is the relative pronoun. Relative pronouns begin dependent clauses known as relative clauses; these are adjective clauses, because they modify nouns. In the following example, the relative clause is bold and the relative pronoun is italicized:
- The only one of the seven dwarfs who does not have a beard is Dopey.
- (The adjective clause who does not have a beard describes the pronoun one.)
A relative adverb plays the role of an adverb in a relative clause, as in
- That is the reason why I came.
- (The relative clause why I came describes the noun reason, and within the relative clause the adverb why modifies the verb came.)
- That is the place where he lives.
- (The relative clause where he lives describes the noun place, and within the relative clause the adverb where modifies the verb lives.)
An interrogative word can serve as an adverb in a noun clause, as in
- No one understands why you need experience.
- (The noun clause why you need experience functions as the direct object of the main-clause verb "understands", and within the noun clause why serves as an adverb modifying need.)
Read more about this topic: Dependent Clause
Famous quotes containing the words dependent and/or words:
“The sadistic person is as dependent on the submissive person as the latter is on the former; neither can live without the other. The difference is only that the sadistic person commands, exploits, hurts, humiliates, and that the masochistic person is commanded, exploited, hurt, humiliated. This is a considerable difference in a realistic sense; in a deeper emotional sense, the difference is not so great as that which they both have in common: fusion without integrity.”
—Erich Fromm (19001980)
“It means eating your words, this thing of refusing to be a fence-sitter, but Id rather eat my words than get calluses from sitting.
No one who has not experienced the condescension of a buyer toward an ordinary salesgirl can have any conception of its withering effect.”
—Mary Barnett Gilson (1877?)