Causes
See also: Deforestation in Brazil#CausesThe Amazon Rainforest is being cut away for many different reasons. Cattle pasture, the valuable hardwood, housing space and farming space (especially for soybeans) are just the main reasons.The annual rate of deforestation in the Amazon region increased from 1990 to 2003 because of factors at local, national, and international levels. 70% of formerly forested land in the Amazon, and 91% of land deforested since 1970, is used for livestock pasture. In addition, Brazil is currently the second-largest global producer of soybeans after the United States, mostly for export and biodiesel production, and as prices for soybeans rise, the soy farmers are pushing northwards into forested areas of the Amazon. As stated in Brazilian legislation, clearing land for crops or fields is considered an ‘effective use’ of land and is the beginning towards land ownership. Cleared property is also valued 5–10 times more than forested land and for that reason valuable to the owner whose ultimate objective is resale. The needs of soy farmers have been used to validate many of the controversial transportation projects that are currently developing in the Amazon. The first two highways: the Belém-Brasília (1958) and the Cuiaba-Porto Velho (1968) were the only federal highways in the Legal Amazon to be paved and passable year-round before the late 1990s. These two highways are said to be “at the heart of the ‘arc of deforestation’”, which at present is the focal point area of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. The Belém-Brasília highway attracted nearly two million settlers in the first twenty years. The success of the Belém-Brasília highway in opening up the forest was reenacted as paved roads continued to be developed unleashing the irrepressible spread of settlement. The completions of the roads were followed by a wave of resettlement and the settlers had a significant effect on the forest.
Scientists using NASA satellite data have found that clearing for mechanized cropland has recently become a significant force in Brazilian Amazon deforestation. This change in land use may alter the region's climate. Researchers found that in 2003, the then peak year of deforestation, more than 20 percent of the Mato Grosso state’s forests were converted to cropland. This finding suggests that the recent cropland expansion in the region is contributing to further deforestation. In 2005, soybean prices fell by more than 25 percent and some areas of Mato Grosso showed a decrease in large deforestation events, although the central agricultural zone continued to clear forests. However, deforestation rates could return to the high levels seen in 2003 as soybean and other crop prices begin to rebound in international markets. This new driver of forest loss suggests that the rise and fall of prices for other crops, beef, and timber may also have a significant impact on future land use in the region, according to the study.
In 1996, the Amazon was reported to have shown a 34% increase in deforestation since 1992. The mean annual deforestation rate from 2000 to 2005 (22,392 km² per year) was 18% higher than in the previous five years (19,018 km² per year). In Brazil, the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE, or National Institute of Space Research) produces deforestation figures annually. Their deforestation estimates are derived from 100 to 220 images taken during the dry season in the Amazon by the Landsat satellite, also may only consider the loss of the Amazon rainforest biome – not the loss of natural fields or savannah within the rainforest. According to INPE, the original Amazon rainforest biome in Brazil of 4,100,000 km² was reduced to 3,403,000 km² by 2005 – representing a loss of 17.1%.
Period | Estimated remaining forest cover in the Brazilian Amazon (km²) |
Annual forest loss (km²) |
Percent of 1970 cover remaining |
Total forest loss since 1970 (km²) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pre–1970 | 4,100,000 | — | — | — |
1977 | 3,955,870 | 21,130 | 96.5% | 144,130 |
1978–1987 | 3,744,570 | 21,130 | 91.3% | 355,430 |
1988 | 3,723,520 | 21,050 | 90.8% | 376,480 |
1989 | 3,705,750 | 17,770 | 90.4% | 394,250 |
1990 | 3,692,020 | 13,730 | 90.0% | 407,980 |
1991 | 3,680,990 | 11,030 | 89.8% | 419,010 |
1992 | 3,667,204 | 13,786 | 89.4% | 432,796 |
1993 | 3,652,308 | 14,896 | 89.1% | 447,692 |
1994 | 3,637,412 | 14,896 | 88.7% | 462,588 |
1995 | 3,608,353 | 29,059 | 88.0% | 491,647 |
1996 | 3,590,192 | 18,161 | 87.6% | 509,808 |
1997 | 3,576,965 | 13,227 | 87.2% | 523,035 |
1998 | 3,559,582 | 17,383 | 86.8% | 540,418 |
1999 | 3,542,323 | 17,259 | 86.4% | 557,677 |
2000 | 3,524,097 | 18,226 | 86.0% | 575,903 |
2001 | 3,505,932 | 18,165 | 85.5% | 594,068 |
2002 | 3,484,538 | 21,394 | 85.0% | 615,462 |
2003 | 3,459,291 | 25,247 | 84.4% | 640,709 |
2004 | 3,431,868 | 27,423 | 83.7% | 668,132 |
2005 | 3,413,022 | 18,846 | 83.2% | 686,978 |
2006 | 3,398,913 | 14,109 | 82.9% | 701,087 |
2007 | 3,387,381 | 11,532 | 82.6% | 712,619 |
2008 | 3,375,413 | 11,968 | 82.3% | 724,587 |
2009 | 3,367,949 | 7,464 | 82.2% | 732,051 |
2010 | 3,360,949 | 7,000 | 82.0% | 739,051 |
2011 | 3,354,711 | 6,238 | 81.8% | 745,289 |
One of the most important causes of deforestation in the Amazon is the cultivation of agricultural commodities such as soya, which is used mainly to feed animals. McDonald's has denied feeding its chickens with soya from the Amazon rainforest supplied by agricultural giant Cargill; however, not only did evidences prove this to be true, but also pointed out the soya farmers were linked to the use of slave laborers, illegal land grabbing and massive deforestation. It has been calculated in 2006 that McDonald's and its suppliers were then responsible for 70,000 km² of the Amazon's deforestation in the preceding three years. Greenpeace have demanded that fast food companies eliminate soya trade and any meat products that are associated with the Amazon rainforest.
Read more about this topic: Deforestation Of The Amazon Rainforest