Types of Charts
| Chart | Process observation | Process observations relationships | Process observations type | Size of shift to detect |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| and R chart | Quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Independent | Variables | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| and s chart | Quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Independent | Variables | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| Shewhart individuals control chart (ImR chart or XmR chart) | Quality characteristic measurement for one observation | Independent | Variables† | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| Three-way chart | Quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Independent | Variables | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| p-chart | Fraction nonconforming within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes† | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| np-chart | Number nonconforming within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes† | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| c-chart | Number of nonconformances within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes† | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| u-chart | Nonconformances per unit within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes† | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| EWMA chart | Exponentially weighted moving average of quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes or variables | Small (< 1.5σ) |
| CUSUM chart | Cumulative sum of quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes or variables | Small (< 1.5σ) |
| Time series model | Quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Autocorrelated | Attributes or variables | N/A |
| Regression control chart | Quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Dependent of process control variables | Variables | Large (≥ 1.5σ) |
| Real-time contrasts chart | Sliding window of quality characteristic measurement within one subgroup | Independent | Attributes or variables | Small (< 1.5σ) |
†Some practitioners also recommend the use of Individuals charts for attribute data, particularly when the assumptions of either binomially distributed data (p- and np-charts) or Poisson-distributed data (u- and c-charts) are violated. Two primary justifications are given for this practice. First, normality is not necessary for statistical control, so the Individuals chart may be used with non-normal data. Second, attribute charts derive the measure of dispersion directly from the mean proportion (by assuming a probability distribution), while Individuals charts derive the measure of dispersion from the data, independent of the mean, making Individuals charts more robust than attributes charts to violations of the assumptions about the distribution of the underlying population. It is sometimes noted that the substitution of the Individuals chart works best for large counts, when the binomial and Poisson distributions approximate a normal distribution. i.e. when the number of trials n > 1000 for p- and np-charts or λ > 500 for u- and c-charts.
Critics of this approach argue that control charts should not be used when their underlying assumptions are violated, such as when process data is neither normally distributed nor binomially (or Poisson) distributed. Such processes are not in control and should be improved before the application of control charts. Additionally, application of the charts in the presence of such deviations increases the type I and type II error rates of the control charts, and may make the chart of little practical use.
Read more about this topic: Control Chart
Famous quotes containing the words types of, types and/or charts:
“Science is intimately integrated with the whole social structure and cultural tradition. They mutually support one other—only in certain types of society can science flourish, and conversely without a continuous and healthy development and application of science such a society cannot function properly.”
—Talcott Parsons (1902–1979)
“Our major universities are now stuck with an army of pedestrian, toadying careerists, Fifties types who wave around Sixties banners to conceal their record of ruthless, beaverlike tunneling to the top.”
—Camille Paglia (b. 1947)
“There’s one basic rule you should remember about development charts that will save you countless hours of worry.... The fact that a child passes through a particular developmental stage is always more important than the age of that child when he or she does it. In the long run, it really doesn’t matter whether you learn to walk at ten months or fifteen months—as long as you learn how to walk.”
—Lawrence Kutner (20th century)