General Case and Theory
A rewriting system can be expressed as a directed graph in which nodes represent expressions and edges represent rewrites. So, for example, if the expression can be rewritten into, then we say that is a reduct of (alternatively, reduces to, or is an expansion of ). This is represented using arrow notation; indicates that reduces to . Intuitively, this means that the corresponding graph has a directed edge from to .
If there is a path between two graph nodes (let's call them and ), then the intermediate nodes form a reduction sequence. So, for instance, if, then we can write, indicating the existence of a reduction sequence from to .
With this established, confluence can be defined as follows. Let a, b, c ∈ S, with a →* b and a →* c. a is deemed confluent if there exists a d ∈ S with b →* d and c →* d. If every a ∈ S is confluent, we say that → is confluent, or has the Church-Rosser property. This property is also sometimes called the diamond property, after the shape of the diagram shown on the right. Caution: other presentations reserve the term diamond property for a variant of the diagram with single reductions everywhere; that is, whenever a → b and a → c, there must exist a d such that b → d and c → d. The single-reduction variant is strictly stronger than the multi-reduction one.
Read more about this topic: Confluence (abstract Rewriting)
Famous quotes containing the words general, case and/or theory:
“In former times and in less complex societies, children could find their way into the adult world by watching workers and perhaps giving them a hand; by lingering at the general store long enough to chat with, and overhear conversations of, adults...; by sharing and participating in the tasks of family and community that were necessary to survival. They were in, and of, the adult world while yet sensing themselves apart as children.”
—Dorothy H. Cohen (20th century)
“Wealth is not without its advantages and the case to the contrary, although it has often been made, has never proved widely persuasive.”
—John Kenneth Galbraith (b. 1908)
“The theory [before the twentieth century] ... was that all the jobs in the world belonged by right to men, and that only men were by nature entitled to wages. If a woman earned money, outside domestic service, it was because some misfortune had deprived her of masculine protection.”
—Rheta Childe Dorr (1866–1948)