The following four layers are the most common layers in a logical multilayered architecture for an information system with an object-oriented design:
- Presentation Layer (a.k.a. UI Layer, View Layer, Presentation Tier.)
- Application Layer (a.k.a. Service Layer or GRASP Controller Layer )
- Business Layer (a.k.a Business logic layer (BLL))
- Infrastructure Layer (Data access layer, Persistence layer, Logging, Networking, and other Services which are required to support a particular Business Layer.)
Some common purposes of the above four layers are for example described in the book about domain-driven design at page 68-74, which is a book that otherwise is focused on describing the Domain layer
Sometimes there is no explicit distinction between the Business Layer and the Application Layer, e.g. the Application Layer is considered as being a part of the Business Layer. On the other hand, it is also possible to even further divide the Application/Business Layers into more layers. For example, if the Model View Presenter pattern is used, then you can consider the Presenter Layer as being a layer between the User Interface Layer and the Application Layer.
The Business Layer can also use a Business Infrastructure Layer (aka low-level business 'services' layer) logically positioned between Business Layer(s) and Infrastructure Layer(s). That layer (BI) is very general and can be used in several application tiers, e.g. a CurrencyConverter.
The Infrastructure Layer may be partitioned into different levels (high-level or low-level technical services). Though, it is not unusual that developers only consider the persistence (data access) and therefore only talk about the Persistence Layer or the Data Access Layer (instead of an Infrastructure Layer or Technical services Layer). In other words, the other kind of technical services are not always being explicitly thought of as being part of any particular layer.
Regarding that all types are not always considered as belonging to one particular layer, according to the "POSA book" (Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture A System of Patterns, page 39) a relaxed layered system (as opposed to a strict layered system) can use so called "shared data definition modules" which are types not belonging in a particular layer.
Famous quotes containing the words common, layers, information, system, logical and/or architecture:
“What had really caused the women’s movement was the additional years of human life. At the turn of the century women’s life expectancy was forty-six; now it was nearly eighty. Our groping sense that we couldn’t live all those years in terms of motherhood alone was “the problem that had no name.” Realizing that it was not some freakish personal fault but our common problem as women had enabled us to take the first steps to change our lives.”
—Betty Friedan (20th century)
“The force of a death should be enormous but how can you know what kind of man you’ve killed or who was the braver and stronger if you have to peer through layers of glass that deliver the image but obscure the meaning of the act? War has a conscience or it’s ordinary murder.”
—Don Delillo (b. 1926)
“Information networks straddle the world. Nothing remains concealed. But the sheer volume of information dissolves the information. We are unable to take it all in.”
—Günther Grass (b. 1927)
“In the course of the actual attainment of selfish ends—an attainment conditioned in this way by universality—there is formed a system of complete interdependence, wherein the livelihood, happiness, and legal status of one man is interwoven with the livelihood, happiness, and rights of all. On this system, individual happiness, etc. depend, and only in this connected system are they actualized and secured.”
—Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770–1831)
“It is possible—indeed possible even according to the old conception of logic—to give in advance a description of all ‘true’ logical propositions. Hence there can never be surprises in logic.”
—Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889–1951)
“In short, the building becomes a theatrical demonstration of its functional ideal. In this romanticism, High-Tech architecture is, of course, no different in spirit—if totally different in form—from all the romantic architecture of the past.”
—Dan Cruickshank (b. 1949)