Common Layers in An Information System Logical Architecture

The following four layers are the most common layers in a logical multilayered architecture for an information system with an object-oriented design:

  • Presentation Layer (a.k.a. UI Layer, View Layer, Presentation Tier.)
  • Application Layer (a.k.a. Service Layer or GRASP Controller Layer )
  • Business Layer (a.k.a Business logic layer (BLL))
  • Infrastructure Layer (Data access layer, Persistence layer, Logging, Networking, and other Services which are required to support a particular Business Layer.)

Some common purposes of the above four layers are for example described in the book about domain-driven design at page 68-74, which is a book that otherwise is focused on describing the Domain layer

Sometimes there is no explicit distinction between the Business Layer and the Application Layer, e.g. the Application Layer is considered as being a part of the Business Layer. On the other hand, it is also possible to even further divide the Application/Business Layers into more layers. For example, if the Model View Presenter pattern is used, then you can consider the Presenter Layer as being a layer between the User Interface Layer and the Application Layer.

The Business Layer can also use a Business Infrastructure Layer (aka low-level business 'services' layer) logically positioned between Business Layer(s) and Infrastructure Layer(s). That layer (BI) is very general and can be used in several application tiers, e.g. a CurrencyConverter.

The Infrastructure Layer may be partitioned into different levels (high-level or low-level technical services). Though, it is not unusual that developers only consider the persistence (data access) and therefore only talk about the Persistence Layer or the Data Access Layer (instead of an Infrastructure Layer or Technical services Layer). In other words, the other kind of technical services are not always being explicitly thought of as being part of any particular layer.

Regarding that all types are not always considered as belonging to one particular layer, according to the "POSA book" (Pattern-Oriented Software Architecture A System of Patterns, page 39) a relaxed layered system (as opposed to a strict layered system) can use so called "shared data definition modules" which are types not belonging in a particular layer.

Famous quotes containing the words common, layers, information, system, logical and/or architecture:

    “Our passions do not live apart in locked chambers but dress in their small wardrobe of notions, bring their provisions to a common table and mess together, feeding out of the common store according to their appetite.”
    —George Eliot [Mary Ann (or Marian)

    “The force of a death should be enormous but how can you know what kind of man you’ve killed or who was the braver and stronger if you have to peer through layers of glass that deliver the image but obscure the meaning of the act? War has a conscience or it’s ordinary murder.”
    —Don Delillo (b. 1926)

    “So while it is true that children are exposed to more information and a greater variety of experiences than were children of the past, it does not follow that they automatically become more sophisticated. We always know much more than we understand, and with the torrent of information to which young people are exposed, the gap between knowing and understanding, between experience and learning, has become even greater than it was in the past.”
    —David Elkind (20th century)

    “Columbus stood in his age as the pioneer of progress and enlightenment. The system of universal education is in our age the most prominent and salutary feature of the spirit of enlightenment, and it is peculiarly appropriate that the schools be made by the people the center of the day’s demonstration. Let the national flag float over every schoolhouse in the country and the exercises be such as shall impress upon our youth the patriotic duties of American citizenship.”
    —Benjamin Harrison (1833–1901)

    “Grammar is a tricky, inconsistent thing. Being the backbone of speech and writing, it should, we think, be eminently logical, make perfect sense, like the human skeleton. But, of course, the skeleton is arbitrary, too. Why twelve pairs of ribs rather than eleven or thirteen? Why thirty-two teeth? It has something to do with evolution and functionalism—but only sometimes, not always. So there are aspects of grammar that make good, logical sense, and others that do not.”
    —John Simon (b. 1925)

    “It seems a fantastic paradox, but it is nevertheless a most important truth, that no architecture can be truly noble which is not imperfect.”
    —John Ruskin (1819–1900)