Collegiate Shag - History

History

Shag has no clear historical record but is often assumed, as with many other swing dances, to have evolved from Foxtrot. Though, there is little evidence to support this claim. In the late 19th century the term "shagger" was supposedly a nickname for vaudeville performers, who were known to dance the flea hop. Later "shag" became a blanket term that signified a broad range of jitterbugging (swing dancing). In the 1930s there were arguably a hundred or more stylistic variations of the dance, which differed depending upon geographic region. Dance instructors at the time eventually generalized these stylistic variations into three rhythmic categories: single, double, and triple shag. The different names are intended to denote the number of 'slow' (e.g., step, hop) steps performed during each basic. The slow steps were then followed by two 'quick' steps (e.g., step, step).

Today, shag enthusiasts and historians also recognize the existence of a fourth original shag rhythm—what has come to be known as "long-double shag". This rhythmic variation is identical to double-shag except that it has four quick steps rather than two. It has been traced to Charlotte, NC, where it co-existed with the triple and single-rhythm variations. It is commonly believed that double-rhythm shag evolved after these, as the dance spread to the north. And, though double shag is the most popular form of collegiate shag today, single was the dominant rhythm during the swing era.

The dance is still performed today (primarily double shag) by swing dance enthusiasts worldwide.

Read more about this topic:  Collegiate Shag

Famous quotes containing the word history:

    Yet poetry, though the last and finest result, is a natural fruit. As naturally as the oak bears an acorn, and the vine a gourd, man bears a poem, either spoken or done. It is the chief and most memorable success, for history is but a prose narrative of poetic deeds.
    Henry David Thoreau (1817–1862)

    To summarize the contentions of this paper then. Firstly, the phrase ‘the meaning of a word’ is a spurious phrase. Secondly and consequently, a re-examination is needed of phrases like the two which I discuss, ‘being a part of the meaning of’ and ‘having the same meaning.’ On these matters, dogmatists require prodding: although history indeed suggests that it may sometimes be better to let sleeping dogmatists lie.
    —J.L. (John Langshaw)

    It gives me the greatest pleasure to say, as I do from the bottom of my heart, that never in the history of the country, in any crisis and under any conditions, have our Jewish fellow citizens failed to live up to the highest standards of citizenship and patriotism.
    William Howard Taft (1857–1930)