Electoral Record
| Ontario general election, 2011: Whitby—Oshawa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
| Progressive Conservative | Christine Elliott | 24,500 | 48.25 | |||
| Liberal | Elizabeth Roy | 16,934 | 33.35 | |||
| New Democratic | Maret Sadem-Thompson | 7,815 | 15.39 | |||
| Green | Bradley Gibson | 1,159 | 2.28 | |||
| Special Needs | Dan King | 213 | 0.42 | |||
| Freedom | Douglas Thom | 160 | 0.32 | |||
| Ontario general election, 2007: Whitby—Oshawa | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | |||
| Progressive Conservative | Christine Elliott | 22,687 | 44.0 | |||
| Liberal | Laura Hammer | 18,560 | 36.0 | |||
| New Democratic | Nigel Moses | 5,733 | 11.1 | |||
| Green | Doug Anderson | 3,745 | 7.3 | |||
| Libertarian | Marty Gobin | 411 | 0.8 | |||
| Family Coalition | Dale Chilvers | 277 | 0.5 | |||
| Freedom | Bill Frampton | 152 | 0.3 | |||
| Total valid votes | 51,565 | 100.0 | ||||
| Ontario provincial by-election, March 30, 2006: Whitby—Ajax | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | % | ±pp | ||
| Progressive Conservative | Christine Elliott | 15,843 | 46.2 | -2.1 | ||
| Liberal | Judi Longfield | 14,529 | 42.3 | +2.2 | ||
| New Democratic | Julie Gladman | 3,204 | 9.3 | +0.2 | ||
| Green | Nick Boileau | 307 | 0.9 | -1.5 | ||
| Freedom | Paul McKeever | 198 | 0.6 | – | ||
| Libertarian | Marty Gobin | 139 | 0.4 | – | ||
| Family Coalition | Victor Carvalho | 102 | 0.3 | – | ||
Read more about this topic: Christine Elliott
Famous quotes containing the words electoral and/or record:
“Nothing is more unreliable than the populace, nothing more obscure than human intentions, nothing more deceptive than the whole electoral system.”
—Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 B.C.)
“All photographs are there to remind us of what we forget. In this—as in other ways—they are the opposite of paintings. Paintings record what the painter remembers. Because each one of us forgets different things, a photo more than a painting may change its meaning according to who is looking at it.”
—John Berger (b. 1926)