Champollion (spacecraft) - Deep Space 4 / Space Technology 4

Deep Space 4 / Space Technology 4

Champollion was revived under NASA's New Millennium program as Deep Space 4 / Space Technology 4, again as a joint project of NASA and CNES. In this version, Champollion would be a stand-alone project consisting of an orbiter and a lander, with the focus shifted somewhat to engineering validation of new technologies rather than pure science.

As of March 1999, the baseline mission was to launch in April 2003, reaching comet Tempel 1 in 2006. The sample return element of the mission was at this point contingent on sufficient funding/resources, possibly being replaced with a demonstration of related capabilities.

The lander was approximately 1.5 m high weighing 160 kg; it was to autonomously navigate to the comet from 50 km altitude and anchor itself with a spike. The planned payload included:

  • CHARGE, a gas chromatograph/mass spectrometer
  • CIRCLE, cameras/microscope/IR spectrometer
  • CIVA, panoramic cameras
  • CPPP, "physical properties probes" to be driven into the cometary surface
  • SATM drill mechanism
  • gamma ray/neutron spectrometer

The orbiter was to carry cameras and a dust monitor.

Later in 1999, Space Technology 4 was scaled back to a single spacecraft with no sample return; it was cancelled entirely on July 1, 1999, due to budgetary constraints.

New Millennium Program
Launched
  • Deep Space 1
  • Deep Space 2
  • Earth Observing-1
  • Space Technology 5
Cancelled
  • Champollion
  • Deep Space 4
  • Earth Observing-2
  • Earth Observing-3
  • Space Technology 4
  • Space Technology 6
  • Space Technology 7
  • Space Technology 8

Read more about this topic:  Champollion (spacecraft)

Famous quotes containing the words deep, space and/or technology:

    “It is not a carol of joy or glee,
    But a prayer that he sends from his heart’s deep core,
    But a plea, that upward to Heaven he flings—
    I know why the caged bird sings!”
    —Paul Laurence Dunbar (1872–1906)

    “As photographs give people an imaginary possession of a past that is unreal, they also help people to take possession of space in which they are insecure.”
    —Susan Sontag (b. 1933)

    “If we had a reliable way to label our toys good and bad, it would be easy to regulate technology wisely. But we can rarely see far enough ahead to know which road leads to damnation. Whoever concerns himself with big technology, either to push it forward or to stop it, is gambling in human lives.”
    —Freeman Dyson (b. 1923)