Causal Filter - Characterization of Causal Filters in The Frequency Domain

Characterization of Causal Filters in The Frequency Domain

Let h(t) be a causal filter with corresponding Fourier transform H(ω). Define the function


g(t) = {h(t) + h^{*}(-t) \over 2}

which is non-causal. On the other hand, g(t) is Hermitian and, consequently, its Fourier transform G(ω) is real-valued. We now have the following relation


h(t) = 2\, \Theta(t) \cdot g(t)\,

where Θ(t) is the Heaviside unit step function.

This means that the Fourier transforms of h(t) and g(t) are related as follows


H(\omega) = \left(\delta(\omega) - {i \over \pi \omega}\right) * G(\omega) =
G(\omega) - i\cdot \widehat G(\omega) \,

where is a Hilbert transform done in the frequency domain (rather than the time domain). The sign of may depend on the definition of the Fourier Transform.

Taking the Hilbert transform of the above equation yields this relation between "H" and its Hilbert transform:


\widehat H(\omega) = i H(\omega)

Read more about this topic:  Causal Filter

Famous quotes containing the words causal, filters, frequency and/or domain:

    There is the illusion of time, which is very deep; who has disposed of it? Mor come to the conviction that what seems the succession of thought is only the distribution of wholes into causal series.
    Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    Raise a million filters and the rain will not be clean, until the longing for it be refined in deep confession. And still we hear, If only this nation had a soul, or, Let us change the way we trade, or, Let us be proud of our region.
    Leonard Cohen (b. 1934)

    One is apt to be discouraged by the frequency with which Mr. Hardy has persuaded himself that a macabre subject is a poem in itself; that, if there be enough of death and the tomb in one’s theme, it needs no translation into art, the bold statement of it being sufficient.
    Rebecca West (1892–1983)

    Every sign is subject to the criteria of ideological evaluation.... The domain of ideology coincides with the domain of signs. They equate with one another. Wherever a sign is present, ideology is present, too. Everything ideological possesses semiotic value.
    —V.N. (Valintin Nikolaevic)