Canonical Transformation - Direct Approach

Direct Approach

The functional form of Hamilton's equations is

$\dot{\mathbf{p}} = -\frac{\partial H}{\partial \mathbf{q}}$

$\dot{\mathbf{q}} =~~\frac{\partial H}{\partial \mathbf{p}}$

By definition, the transformed coordinates have analogous dynamics

$\dot{\mathbf{P}} = -\frac{\partial K}{\partial \mathbf{Q}}$

$\dot{\mathbf{Q}} =~~\frac{\partial K}{\partial \mathbf{P}}$

where K(Q,P) is a new Hamiltonian that must be determined.

In general, a transformation (q,p,t) → (Q,P,t) does not preserve the form of Hamilton's equations. For time independent transformations between (q,p) and (Q,P) we may check if the transformation is restricted canonical, as follows. Since restricted transformations have no explicit time dependence (by construction), the time derivative of a new generalized coordinate Q_m is

$\dot{Q}_{m} = \frac{\partial Q_{m}}{\partial \mathbf{q}} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{q}} + \frac{\partial Q_{m}}{\partial \mathbf{p}} \cdot \dot{\mathbf{p}} = \frac{\partial Q_{m}}{\partial \mathbf{q}} \cdot \frac{\partial H}{\partial \mathbf{p}} - \frac{\partial Q_{m}}{\partial \mathbf{p}} \cdot \frac{\partial H}{\partial \mathbf{q}} = \lbrace Q_m, H \rbrace$

where is the Poisson bracket.

We also have the identity for the conjugate momentum P_m

$\frac{\partial H}{\partial P_{m}} = \frac{\partial H}{\partial \mathbf{q}} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{q}}{\partial P_{m}} + \frac{\partial H}{\partial \mathbf{p}} \cdot \frac{\partial \mathbf{p}}{\partial P_{m}}$

If the transformation is canonical, these two must be equal, resulting in the equations

$\left( \frac{\partial Q_{m}}{\partial p_{n}}\right)_{\mathbf{q}, \mathbf{p}} = -\left( \frac{\partial q_{n}}{\partial P_{m}}\right)_{\mathbf{Q}, \mathbf{P}}$

$\left( \frac{\partial Q_{m}}{\partial q_{n}}\right)_{\mathbf{q}, \mathbf{p}} = \left( \frac{\partial p_{n}}{\partial P_{m}}\right)_{\mathbf{Q}, \mathbf{P}}$

The analogous argument for the generalized momenta P_m leads to two other sets of equations

$\left( \frac{\partial P_{m}}{\partial p_{n}}\right)_{\mathbf{q}, \mathbf{p}} = \left( \frac{\partial q_{n}}{\partial Q_{m}}\right)_{\mathbf{Q}, \mathbf{P}}$

$\left( \frac{\partial P_{m}}{\partial q_{n}}\right)_{\mathbf{q}, \mathbf{p}} = -\left( \frac{\partial p_{n}}{\partial Q_{m}}\right)_{\mathbf{Q}, \mathbf{P}}$

These are the direct conditions to check whether a given transformation is canonical.

Read more about this topic: Canonical Transformation

Famous quotes containing the words direct and/or approach:

“The most passionate, consistent, extreme and implacable enemy of the Enlightenment and ... all forms of rationalism ... was Johann Georg Hamann. His influence, direct and indirect, upon the romantic revolt against universalism and scientific method ... was considerable and perhaps crucial.”
—Isaiah Berlin (b. 1909)

“F.R. Leavis’s “eat up your broccoli” approach to fiction emphasises this junkfood/wholefood dichotomy. If reading a novel—for the eighteenth century reader, the most frivolous of diversions—did not, by the middle of the twentieth century, make you a better person in some way, then you might as well flush the offending volume down the toilet, which was by far the best place for the undigested excreta of dubious nourishment.”
—Angela Carter (1940–1992)