Determining Candidate Keys
The previous example only illustrates the definition of a candidate key and not how these are determined in practice. It is important to determine all superkeys, which is especially difficult if the relation represents a set of relationships rather than a set of entities. Therefore it is often useful to attempt to find any "forgotten" superkeys by also determining the functional dependencies. We can derive more superkeys by applying the following rule:
- if S is a superkey and X→Y a functional dependency
- then (S ∖ {Y}) ∪ {X} is also a superkey, where '\' is the set difference.
Consider for example the relation
- Marriage (Husband, Wife, Date)
for which it will trivially hold that
- {Husband, Wife, Date}
is a superkey. If we assume that a certain person can marry at most once on a given date then this implies the functional dependencies:
- {Husband, Date} → Wife
- {Wife, Date} → Husband
In this case, applying the above rule leads to the derivation of the superkeys {Husband, Date} and {Wife, Date} respectively.
Read more about this topic: Candidate Key
Famous quotes containing the words determining, candidate and/or keys:
“Our civilization has decided ... that determining the guilt or innocence of men is a thing too important to be trusted to trained men.... When it wants a library catalogued, or the solar system discovered, or any trifle of that kind, it uses up its specialists. But when it wishes anything done which is really serious, it collects twelve of the ordinary men standing round. The same thing was done, if I remember right, by the Founder of Christianity.”
—Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874–1936)
“If we should swap a good library for a second-rate stump speech and not ask for boot, it would be thoroughly in tune with our hearts. For deep within each of us lies politics. It is our football, baseball, and tennis rolled into one. We enjoy it; we will hitch up and drive for miles in order to hear and applaud the vitriolic phrases of a candidate we have already reckoned we’ll vote against.”
—Federal Writers’ Project Of The Wor, U.S. public relief program (1935-1943)
“And yet we constantly reclaim some part of that primal spontaneity through the youngest among us, not only through their sorrow and anger but simply through everyday discoveries, life unwrapped. To see a child touch the piano keys for the first time, to watch a small body slice through the surface of the water in a clean dive, is to experience the shock, not of the new, but of the familiar revisited as though it were strange and wonderful.”
—Anna Quindlen (b. 1952)