Biodiversity Indicators Partnership - Partners

Partners

The Partnership brings together a host of international organisations working to support the regular delivery of biodiversity indicators at the global, national and regional levels.

Partners of the BIP can be separated into the following categories:

STEERING COMMITTEE
Advise on the general direction of the BIP project, and review and provide advice on key outputs
KEY INDICATOR PARTNERS
Develop and implement the biodiversity indicators
ASSOCIATE INDICATOR PARTNERS
Assist in the development and implementation of the indicator suite, and/or provide support to the Partnership
AFFILIATE PARTNERS
Work towards similar aims and objectives as the BIP, although at different scales
Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity(CBD)
European Environment Agency(EEA)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Global Environment Facility (GEF)
International Union for Conservation of Nature(IUCN)
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP WCMC)
Bioversity International
BirdLife International
Conservation International (CI)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Global Footprint Network (GFN)
Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP)
Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London (ZSL)
International Nitrogen Initiative (INI)
IUCN Species Survival Commission (IUCN SSC)
IUCN Sustainable Use Specialist Group
IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (IUCN WCPA)
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB)
Sea Around Us Project
The Nature Conservancy (TNC)
TRAFFIC International
Union for Ethical BioTrade (UEBT)
University of British Columbia (UBC) Fisheries Centre
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)
UNEP Global Environmental Monitoring System (GEMS) Water Programme
United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC)
University of Queensland, Australia
Wetlands International
World Health Organization (WHO)
World Wide Fund for Nature WWF
Convention on Migratory Species (CMS)
Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)
International Council on Mining and Metals (ICMM)
Global Land Cover Facility, NASA/NGO Biodiversity Working Group
Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
Terralingua
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP)
Wildlife Conservation Society
ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity
Biotrade Initiative
Center for International Earth Science Information Network
Countdown 2010
Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Program (CBMP)
Global Reporting Initiative
International Indigenous Forum on Biodiversity
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD)
Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands (LADA)
NorBio2010
PROMEBIO: A Regional Strategic Biodiversity Monitoring and Evaluation Program for Central America
Streamlining European 2010 Biodiversity Indicators (SEBI2010)
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB)
United Nations University - The Institute for Water, Environment and Health
Tour du valat
Water Footprint Network

Read more about this topic:  Biodiversity Indicators Partnership

Famous quotes containing the word partners:

    And one of his partners asked “Has he vertigo?” and the other glanced out and down and said “Oh no, only about ten feet more.”
    Ogden Nash (1902–1971)

    I have had, and may have still, a thousand friends, as they are called, in life, who are like one’s partners in the waltz of this world—not much remembered when the ball is over.
    George Gordon Noel Byron (1788–1824)

    What exacerbates the strain in the working class is the absence of money to pay for services they need, economic insecurity, poor daycare, and lack of dignity and boredom in each partner’s job. What exacerbates it in upper-middle class is the instability of paid help and the enormous demands of the career system in which both partners become willing believers. But the tug between traditional and egalitarian models of marriage runs from top to bottom of the class ladder.
    Arlie Hochschild (20th century)