Bank Filtration - Efficiency

Efficiency

Three filtration mechanisms are possible. Physical filtration or straining takes places when suspended particulates are too large to pass through interstitial spaces between alluvial soil particles. Biological filtration occurs when soil microorganisms remove and digest dissolved or suspended organic material and chemical nutrients. Chemical filtration or ion exchange may take place when aquifer soils react with soluble chemicals in the water. Most 'normal' contaminants (microbial organisms and inorganic or organic pollutants) will be removed by bank filtration, either because they get filtered out by the sand/earth of the bank, or because the passage time (which may be days or potentially weeks) is sufficient to render them inactive. Research has also shown that the removal efficiency depends not only on the contaminant, but also on the "hydraulic and chemical characteristics of the bottom sediment and the aquifer, the local recharge-discharge conditions, and biochemical processes".

There have been indications that some pharmaceutical compounds (medical drug traces from human use) may not always be sufficiently removed by bank filtration, and that in areas with substantial contamination of this type, additional treatment may be needed.

Read more about this topic:  Bank Filtration

Famous quotes containing the word efficiency:

    I’ll take fifty percent efficiency to get one hundred percent loyalty.
    Samuel Goldwyn (1882–1974)

    Nothing comes to pass in nature, which can be set down to a flaw therein; for nature is always the same and everywhere one and the same in her efficiency and power of action; that is, nature’s laws and ordinances whereby all things come to pass and change from one form to another, are everywhere and always; so that there should be one and the same method of understanding the nature of all things whatsoever, namely, through nature’s universal laws and rules.
    Baruch (Benedict)

    “Never hug and kiss your children! Mother love may make your children’s infancy unhappy and prevent them from pursuing a career or getting married!” That’s total hogwash, of course. But it shows on extreme example of what state-of-the-art “scientific” parenting was supposed to be in early twentieth-century America. After all, that was the heyday of efficiency experts, time-and-motion studies, and the like.
    Lawrence Kutner (20th century)