Arithmetic Derivative - Definition

Definition

For natural numbers the arithmetic derivative is defined as follows:

  • for any prime .
  • for any (Leibniz rule).

To coincide with the Leibniz rule is defined to be, as is . Explicitly, assume that

where are distinct primes and are positive integers. Then

The arithmetic derivative also preserves the power rule (for primes):

where is prime and is a positive integer. For example,


\begin{align}
81' = (3^4)' & = (9\cdot 9)' = 9'\cdot 9 + 9\cdot 9' = 2 \\
& = 2 = 2 = 108 = 4\cdot 3^3.
\end{align}

The sequence of number derivatives for k = 0, 1, 2, ... begins (sequence A003415 in OEIS):

0, 0, 1, 1, 4, 1, 5, 1, 12, 6, 7, 1, 16, 1, 9, ....

E. J. Barbeau was the first to formalize this definition. He extended it to all integers by proving that uniquely defines the derivative over the integers. Barbeau also further extended it to rational numbers,showing that the familiar quotient rule gives a well-defined derivative on Q:

Victor Ufnarovski and Bo Åhlander expanded it to certain irrationals. In these extensions, the formula above still applies, but the exponents are allowed to be arbitrary rational numbers.

The logarithmic derivative is a totally additive function.

Read more about this topic:  Arithmetic Derivative

Famous quotes containing the word definition:

    “Scientific method is the way to truth, but it affords, even in
    principle, no unique definition of truth. Any so-called pragmatic
    definition of truth is doomed to failure equally.”
    —Willard Van Orman Quine (b. 1908)

    “The physicians say, they are not materialists; but they are:MSpirit is matter reduced to an extreme thinness: O so thin!—But the definition of spiritual should be, that which is its own evidence. What notions do they attach to love! what to religion! One would not willingly pronounce these words in their hearing, and give them the occasion to profane them.”
    —Ralph Waldo Emerson (1803–1882)

    “It is very hard to give a just definition of love. The most we can say of it is this: that in the soul, it is a desire to rule; in the spirit, it is a sympathy; and in the body, it is but a hidden and subtle desire to possess—after many mysteries—what one loves.”
    —François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld (1613–1680)