Alexander Theroux - Controversy

Controversy

“Hateful, Hurtful, and Hellish” was an article by Alexander Theroux that was published on June 1, 1995 in the San Diego Reader in which he stated, “I was being charged with plagiarism in a work of non-fiction with less than 150 of about 80,000 words—in a book citing upwards of a thousand or more disparate quotations taken from film, literature, science, art, religion, cooking, painting, botany, music, etc.—which amounted to an offending .0001875 percent, according to the San Diego Reader, a periodical that published the full explanation that I composed within a week of the charges being made, when the New York Times, particularly editor Chip McGrath of the ‘Book Review’ cravenly refused to run it, although that it was that newspaper that on March 3, 1995 made the front-page allegation. “It was an ignominious moment in my life, to be sure, although the accusation, which was literally true but morally not—since intention was not involved—had a dirty provenance, to my mind, not only because it was a nonstory but because it involved but a few sentences.

Read more about this topic:  Alexander Theroux

Famous quotes containing the word controversy:

    Ours was a highly activist administration, with a lot of controversy involved ... but I’m not sure that it would be inconsistent with my own political nature to do it differently if I had it to do all over again.
    Jimmy Carter (James Earl Carter, Jr.)

    And therefore, as when there is a controversy in an account, the parties must by their own accord, set up for right Reason, the Reason of some Arbitrator, or Judge, to whose sentence, they will both stand, or their controversy must either come to blows, or be undecided, for want of a right Reason constituted by Nature; so is it also in all debates of what kind soever.
    Thomas Hobbes (1579–1688)